←back to thread

471 points tosh | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
willemlaurentz ◴[] No.41859182[source]
Agree with author that the plane seems to be the only place where it is socially acceptable to wear the skimask.

My wife still makes fun of me when I'm working at home with Vision Pro - I wouldn't wear it out in public. See: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41836437

replies(5): >>41859268 #>>41859432 #>>41861978 #>>41863531 #>>41868588 #
ljf ◴[] No.41859432[source]
It is also one of the few public places to 'safely' do it.

Would you feel comfortable wearing one and limiting your awareness of your surroundings on a public bus? In a coffee shop? Sitting outside a coffee shop? In a park? In a pub?

And also your answers may be yes if you are male, but I can imagine in the current world we live in a lot of women would feel potentially at risk if they were wearing these in public.

replies(1): >>41859647 #
tesch1 ◴[] No.41859647[source]
Train travel is great with one too.
replies(1): >>41860026 #
prmoustache ◴[] No.41860026{3}[source]
You have a whole screen (large windows) at the side of your seat with landscape and stuff to actually enjoy on a train.
replies(5): >>41860395 #>>41861373 #>>41861862 #>>41863535 #>>41863583 #
dagmx ◴[] No.41861373{4}[source]
You assume that most train rides offer a good view, and a view that the commuter would find novel.

If I’m taking a commuter train every day , my view is not something great. Most of the time it’s rundown houses, tunnels or fences. This has been my experience in the UK, US and Canada.

If I’m taking a more long distance train, you assume I’m sat on the side with a view. Ever taken a mountain train? One side just gets rocks wizzing by.

You also assume they’re travelling in weather and a time of day that affords them a good view. Traveling at night? Traveling in misty weather?

And all that aside, you assume they’d prefer to look at the same things you do.

replies(2): >>41861985 #>>41862950 #
brailsafe ◴[] No.41862950{5}[source]
Still, are those temporary inconveniences so dull that you can't read a book or something? Why cling to a desperate need for hyper stimulation when you could just relax with a newspaper or book. Oh jeez, it's misty out, and I forgot my ridiculous VR goggles, guess I'll just be sad :(
replies(1): >>41863505 #
dagmx ◴[] No.41863505{6}[source]
Because other people might enjoy things other than books or newspapers?

Seriously, is everyone on here so narcissistic that they can’t imagine other people want other things?

replies(1): >>41865708 #
brailsafe ◴[] No.41865708{7}[source]
My comment, in retrospect, came across needlessly aggro and dismissive, and I apologize for that; the downvotes were justified and I don't know what frame of mind I was in. Your comment struck me as a complaint about circumstances though rather than interest, to which I'd say have at it, do what you want to do with the tech you want to do it with; I just personally can't relate to the temporary lack of novelty during a commute seeming like a sensible reason for spending so much on this particular kind of device that doesn't really seem to serve another purpose. A steam deck, iPad pro, portable gaming system perhaps, all kinds of others, but the AVP seems like a bit out of scope somehow. I personally bring along a Nintendo DS, or a book, or whatever else, but I'd kind of think if my commute was so sufficiently long and dull that I'd want something more substantial, I'd just really start looking into a much bigger change.

I've taken the train across the Canadian prairies, and my god is that dull, but I just chatted with people, did a bit on my laptop, looked out the window since there always is one, read, used my Gameboy. If I wanted to completely immerse myself in anything but the train experience, I'd just fly, it's cheaper anyway

replies(1): >>41867725 #
1. dagmx ◴[] No.41867725{8}[source]
Out of curiosity, have you tried the Vision Pro ? I legitimately ask because it sounds like you think it isolates you somehow from the rest of the world around you.

But you can still see the world and communicate with others. Why is that materially different than being engrossed in a handheld video game with headphones in?

Also all your examples of other stuff you do to occupy the time, they are all temporary. Why do you think the Vision Pro user would use it the whole ride?

I think this is down to the Boolean nature of “is this normalized or not”

Because it’s not normalized, people don’t afford it the same benefit of the doubt of other things that they have normalized in their life.

replies(1): >>41874429 #
2. brailsafe ◴[] No.41874429[source]
No I haven't, and I am somewhat curious, but I'm also keeping up with it through some of the swift/apple podcasts and YT channels I follow. For me it's more about the cost, physical overhead, and (apparent) lack of other utility, which all-together would to me be sort of a more involved commitment than some little thing I may or may not ever bring out..

I'd only ever consider bringing something that is nearly invisible to both myself and others in terms of weight and required infrastructure, wouldn't bring anything with me for the purpose of occupying my attention that I can't forget I have, or that would consume more than a negligible amount of space/weight; I'll bring a book, but not a tome

Incidentally, Canadian cross-country trains don't even have outlets at the seat as far as I know; they're quite old sadly.

That said, I buy almost no superfluous electronics for raw consumption, and even an iPad Pro would be wildly out of scope, as nice as they seem to be, since although they do have other utility, I can't picture myself doing more than reading or watching videos. On-the-go entertainment is something I try to keep at arms length so I can spend that time at peace.

Fwiw, I do also hope it doesn't become normalized, not to squash others' potential for fun, but because our existing devices already enable people to protect themselves from social interaction on a large scale, which strikes me as damaging.

replies(1): >>41875428 #
3. brailsafe ◴[] No.41875428[source]
I'd add that this is all really only applies to various modes of commuting and travel, I have no qualms with the device itself, only the idea of using it regularly in-transit.