Most active commenters
  • dagmx(6)
  • brailsafe(4)
  • prmoustache(3)
  • Terretta(3)
  • cchi_co(3)

←back to thread

471 points tosh | 47 comments | | HN request time: 2.396s | source | bottom
1. willemlaurentz ◴[] No.41859182[source]
Agree with author that the plane seems to be the only place where it is socially acceptable to wear the skimask.

My wife still makes fun of me when I'm working at home with Vision Pro - I wouldn't wear it out in public. See: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41836437

replies(5): >>41859268 #>>41859432 #>>41861978 #>>41863531 #>>41868588 #
2. throwaway48476 ◴[] No.41859268[source]
I saw someone parked in their car wearing one.
replies(1): >>41871177 #
3. ljf ◴[] No.41859432[source]
It is also one of the few public places to 'safely' do it.

Would you feel comfortable wearing one and limiting your awareness of your surroundings on a public bus? In a coffee shop? Sitting outside a coffee shop? In a park? In a pub?

And also your answers may be yes if you are male, but I can imagine in the current world we live in a lot of women would feel potentially at risk if they were wearing these in public.

replies(1): >>41859647 #
4. tesch1 ◴[] No.41859647[source]
Train travel is great with one too.
replies(1): >>41860026 #
5. prmoustache ◴[] No.41860026{3}[source]
You have a whole screen (large windows) at the side of your seat with landscape and stuff to actually enjoy on a train.
replies(5): >>41860395 #>>41861373 #>>41861862 #>>41863535 #>>41863583 #
6. ◴[] No.41860395{4}[source]
7. dagmx ◴[] No.41861373{4}[source]
You assume that most train rides offer a good view, and a view that the commuter would find novel.

If I’m taking a commuter train every day , my view is not something great. Most of the time it’s rundown houses, tunnels or fences. This has been my experience in the UK, US and Canada.

If I’m taking a more long distance train, you assume I’m sat on the side with a view. Ever taken a mountain train? One side just gets rocks wizzing by.

You also assume they’re travelling in weather and a time of day that affords them a good view. Traveling at night? Traveling in misty weather?

And all that aside, you assume they’d prefer to look at the same things you do.

replies(2): >>41861985 #>>41862950 #
8. jedberg ◴[] No.41861862{4}[source]
When I take trains in Europe, I tend to look out the window, and they often have nice views.

When I take trains in the USA, I usually look out for a few seconds every couple of minutes, because it's mostly the same -- lower-middle class housing or warehouses if we're in a city, or ugly terrain outside of a city.

replies(3): >>41862869 #>>41863037 #>>41864039 #
9. baxtr ◴[] No.41861978[source]
Can you elaborate on the working part?

I tested the device in an Apple Store and was blown away by the experience. Such an amazing tool to explore, enjoy and relax.

The work part though? I had the same feeling as with the iPad early on. I need a keyboard and a mouse to be productive.

replies(5): >>41862115 #>>41862145 #>>41862288 #>>41863211 #>>41863538 #
10. prmoustache ◴[] No.41861985{5}[source]
I guess that is based on experience as I have commuted in the swiss alps for years by train. There is even a tunnel when you are comming from Freiburg in direction of Lausanne/Geneva where you can count down the exact moment the tourists will let escape a collective woooaaaaah once the train exit the tunnel to a majestic view of Lake of Geneva with the alps and the Mont Blanc in the background.

There are some views you never get tired of looking at, especially as seasons, weather, clouds and time of the day makes it an ever changing postcard.

All in all in most of europe the trains usually offer nice views and I often find myself daydreaming about climbing that dirt trail on the left with my bike, riding my motorbike on that twisty road on the right side a few minutes later and what kind of life was it living 500 years ago in the old castle I can see here.

replies(3): >>41862424 #>>41862561 #>>41863245 #
11. nine_k ◴[] No.41862115[source]
I don't see why won't you be able use a keyboard if you can touch-type. I can imagine that a CAD or an animation app could make great use of the 3D views, a mouse for precise coordinate input, and a keyboard for numeric and text input.

I wonder how soon will Maya or CATIA offer good enough integration. Maybe they already offer it at the high end.

replies(2): >>41865051 #>>41868967 #
12. theturtletalks ◴[] No.41862145[source]
Apple Vision Pro can recognize a Macbook and turn that screen into the "theater" screen so you can continue using your Macbook as is with the keyboard and trackpad.

There was even a Youtuber that got annoyed of the black screen on the Macbook when doing this that he removed the screen from a Macbook altogether[0].

0. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUa_pPUbpGQ

13. Terretta ◴[] No.41862288[source]
> The work part though? I had the same feeling as with the iPad early on. I need a keyboard and a mouse to be productive.

Both my iPad Pro and my Vision Pro have a keyboard and trackpad:

- The iPad Pro of course uses the excellent Magic Keyboard.

- The Vision Pro uses an Apple keyboard w/o numpad side by side with the Magic Trackpad, in a custom tray to hold both. (Make sure that your carryon's front pocket can hold the full tray.)

For sure if I thought I could only do work on a MacBook not an iPad Pro (what most people seem to think, insisting iPad is a consumption device), then I definitely couldn't work on a Vision Pro.

But once you've figured out how to code (e.g. VSCode using blink code, or Koder, Working Copy, Textastic, etc.), do graphic design (e.g. Affinity suite), or run Office on an iPad (Teams, Outlook, Word, PowerPoint, Excel), the Vision Pro does those too but with "all the app windows at once" (ofc, iPad Pro 13" makes excellent use of Stage Manager for window groups).

All that said, I haven't felt a burden to pull AVP out on the plane.

iPad Pro 13" HDR with AirPods Pro USB-C using Spatial Audio that anchors to your iPad screen seem more than enough. Especially since you can share audio with a seat mate who also has AirPods, and both watch the same movie together.

Not often talked about: for doing real work, do consider a fresh glasses prescription and the Zeiss add-ins. To keep windows rectangular instead of trapezoid, insist you're under 40 regardless of your age, otherwise Zeiss do a stealth "progressive" that warps window sizes.

replies(1): >>41863533 #
14. dagmx ◴[] No.41862424{6}[source]
This feels like you’re judging others for not being fortunate enough to live in the same place you do. It’s a bit narcissistic of a viewpoint imho.
replies(2): >>41862534 #>>41862544 #
15. pests ◴[] No.41862534{7}[source]
At the same time, I feel you are being dismissive of the beauty around us every day. I used to bus the same route every day for months; and every day I would look out my window and just take it in. People watching, seeing buildings grow under construction, the changing of the trees. The sunset is always beautiful, imo.

Why must we always escape?

replies(2): >>41863474 #>>41863673 #
16. FredPret ◴[] No.41862544{7}[source]
I think he’s just saying he has a nice train ride.
replies(1): >>41863481 #
17. CPLX ◴[] No.41862561{6}[source]
I mean you literally live in Switzerland. It's the most photogenic place on the planet.

Some of us live in places like Baltimore, or Staten Island.

replies(1): >>41863956 #
18. erickhill ◴[] No.41862869{5}[source]
You’d enjoy the Amtrak from Seattle to Vancouver along the water at sunset. You can buy a glass of wine and enjoy the majestic views.
19. brailsafe ◴[] No.41862950{5}[source]
Still, are those temporary inconveniences so dull that you can't read a book or something? Why cling to a desperate need for hyper stimulation when you could just relax with a newspaper or book. Oh jeez, it's misty out, and I forgot my ridiculous VR goggles, guess I'll just be sad :(
replies(1): >>41863505 #
20. samatman ◴[] No.41863037{5}[source]
Having ridden both routes, the Amtrak from Denver to Reno has a spectacularly better view than the Eurostar from London to Brussels. The food is also better.

These kinds of broad comparisons are utterly useless. Continents are much too large for that kind of thing to be anything resembling accurate.

21. sleepybrett ◴[] No.41863211[source]
It's really unfortunate that they decided for an ios variant instead of a macos variant for the vision pro. Even if the power of macos (a real filesystem and the software library) is hidden behind a 'expert mode' or some shit.

I want to replace my macbook, I don't want to replace my ipad. I can't work properly on my ipad unless i'm using it as a dumb terminal. And at the price point of a macbook that's what it should be replacing.

People may point out that i can use it to mirror my macbook screen.. but now i'm paying 2x to replace a screen. I think this is a primary misplay in he vision pro strategy.

Give me a windowing system that lets me place windows, not in a little box that is essentially a virtual monitor, but wherever i want in my immediate vicinity. Let me put my goland/ide window front and center, let me put a terminal to the left, and my music player above.. whatever.

I'd take a vision pro with much of the compute hardware stripped out but that I can tether to a macbook via usbc/thunderbolt as well.. just not an ipad strapped to my face.

replies(1): >>41868289 #
22. richardw ◴[] No.41863245{6}[source]
Maybe record that amazing commute so the less fortunate train travelers can play it on an Apple Vision Pro? Bit of a rubbish arrival surprise at work, but we can solve that next!
23. dagmx ◴[] No.41863474{8}[source]
Because not everyone has the same view afforded to them at all times?

Again, you are fortunate to have a view that you enjoy. That doesn’t extend to others, unless you believe that there are no other situations on the planet other than your own.

24. dagmx ◴[] No.41863481{8}[source]
No, he’s telling other people to also act like he does.

It’s great he can enjoy it but it’s self centered to tell others to do the same.

replies(1): >>41863983 #
25. dagmx ◴[] No.41863505{6}[source]
Because other people might enjoy things other than books or newspapers?

Seriously, is everyone on here so narcissistic that they can’t imagine other people want other things?

replies(1): >>41865708 #
26. cchi_co ◴[] No.41863531[source]
At least you’ve got some tech freedom at home
27. cheschire ◴[] No.41863533{3}[source]
I had no idea that’s what Spatial Audio meant. I thought naively that it was just another marketing jargon for surround sound.

Now I wish I had gone for the bose QC ultra buds instead of the QC II buds.

replies(2): >>41865030 #>>41865048 #
28. threeseed ◴[] No.41863535{4}[source]
That gets old after about an hour.

Especially if you're travelling through cityscapes that aren't that appealing.

29. cchi_co ◴[] No.41863538[source]
The Vision Pro might be brilliant for consuming content, but if you're trying to get work done...
30. cchi_co ◴[] No.41863583{4}[source]
It’s nice to have something to switch to
31. IncreasePosts ◴[] No.41863673{8}[source]
Aren't you escaping too? You could be alone with your thoughts, but instead you are piping inconsequential outside details into your brain.
replies(1): >>41865435 #
32. prmoustache ◴[] No.41863956{7}[source]
I am not living there anymore and I still like to take the train and enjoy looking at the window. Sometimes it is just looking at people doing stuff.

You might find that real life is boring, I find that most tv shows and movies are super predictable, following the very similar scenaristic mechanics and aren't more entertaining. Obviously some are also very nice, but these are the ones you would like to watch comfortably on your sofa or in a theater, not in a train or plane anyway.

33. kridsdale3 ◴[] No.41863983{9}[source]
This is one of the most tone-deaf moments I have ever seen in an internet discussion. The guy lives in the closest thing we have to heaven on earth, a bountiful paradise of gorgeous beauty admired from afar the world over, and says to those of us living in crap-world that we should be grateful for what nature gives us.
34. Arrath ◴[] No.41864039{5}[source]
I have to say, taking the night train from Moscow to St Petersburg was eye opening.

I went from modern metropolis of skyscrapers and tower cranes to run down rusty industrial facilities that wouldn't look out of place in a STALKER game to sod roofed villages that look as they might have when Napoleon was making an ill fated expedition. Then of course a vast expanse of nothing at all.

35. Terretta ◴[] No.41865030{4}[source]
More about Apple's spatial audio and head tracking:

https://support.apple.com/guide/airpods/control-spatial-audi...

36. DidYaWipe ◴[] No.41865048{4}[source]
"Spatial Audio" is "simulated" surround. Apple is undoubtedly using its engine to pan the audio as you move around in this example, but the main point is to market Dolby Atmos as useful with only two speakers.
replies(1): >>41865217 #
37. DidYaWipe ◴[] No.41865051{3}[source]
They could if the Vision Pro had a video input.
38. Terretta ◴[] No.41865217{5}[source]
> "Spatial Audio" is "simulated" surround. Apple is undoubtedly using its engine to pan the audio as you move around in this example, but the main point is to market Dolby Atmos as useful with only two speakers.

Apple Music marks Dolby Atmos and Spatial Audio separately. They are not the same experience for the listener. They do work well together.

Since we only have two ears, a degree of our surround cue comes from where the sounds are when we move our heads.

Apple's "motion tracking in space" spatial audio implementation taps into that to an uncanny degree, because your own motion is not simulated. Real motion in real space results in a real sound difference from the sound model that, you're right, is simulating how that motion should sound relative to the origin.

As a listener, you start to forget the sound isn't centered out there on the anchor point, and then you start thinking the surround sounds are really surrounding you...

Here are two different explainers:

- https://appleinsider.com/articles/21/05/18/apples-spatial-au...

- https://www.gearpatrol.com/tech/apple-spatial-audio-vs-dolby...

Note that I disagree with the second explainer's final section that surround sound speakers like Sonos are the same "spatial audio" as the motion tracking sound modeling Apple is doing.

I agree with the first explainer that Apple's Spatial Audio is a system that takes advantage of the gyroscopes and sensors in the listening device and headphones to, yes, “simulate” a 3D listening space that stays static as you move your head.

39. aphantastic ◴[] No.41865435{9}[source]
Isn’t that escaping too? You could be engaged in the real world forming real connections but instead have self isolated.

Probably the point is that there are many mindstates to be in and maybe we should just let folks do their thing.

40. brailsafe ◴[] No.41865708{7}[source]
My comment, in retrospect, came across needlessly aggro and dismissive, and I apologize for that; the downvotes were justified and I don't know what frame of mind I was in. Your comment struck me as a complaint about circumstances though rather than interest, to which I'd say have at it, do what you want to do with the tech you want to do it with; I just personally can't relate to the temporary lack of novelty during a commute seeming like a sensible reason for spending so much on this particular kind of device that doesn't really seem to serve another purpose. A steam deck, iPad pro, portable gaming system perhaps, all kinds of others, but the AVP seems like a bit out of scope somehow. I personally bring along a Nintendo DS, or a book, or whatever else, but I'd kind of think if my commute was so sufficiently long and dull that I'd want something more substantial, I'd just really start looking into a much bigger change.

I've taken the train across the Canadian prairies, and my god is that dull, but I just chatted with people, did a bit on my laptop, looked out the window since there always is one, read, used my Gameboy. If I wanted to completely immerse myself in anything but the train experience, I'd just fly, it's cheaper anyway

replies(1): >>41867725 #
41. dagmx ◴[] No.41867725{8}[source]
Out of curiosity, have you tried the Vision Pro ? I legitimately ask because it sounds like you think it isolates you somehow from the rest of the world around you.

But you can still see the world and communicate with others. Why is that materially different than being engrossed in a handheld video game with headphones in?

Also all your examples of other stuff you do to occupy the time, they are all temporary. Why do you think the Vision Pro user would use it the whole ride?

I think this is down to the Boolean nature of “is this normalized or not”

Because it’s not normalized, people don’t afford it the same benefit of the doubt of other things that they have normalized in their life.

replies(1): >>41874429 #
42. cesarb ◴[] No.41868289{3}[source]
> I want to replace my macbook, I don't want to replace my ipad. [...] People may point out that i can use it to mirror my macbook screen.. but now i'm paying 2x to replace a screen. I think this is a primary misplay in he vision pro strategy.

The SimulaVR guys (who are working on a competitor to the Vision Pro) had the exact same opinion (https://simulavr.com/blog/chassis-adjustments-and-apv-reacti...):

> From our perspective, we still think the main problem with the AVP is that it only supports native iPad apps (at least for 2D apps) [...] The AVP does allow you to tether to another Mac, but this relegates its usability to that of a "laptop aid" rather than a "laptop replacement". [...] We want to do this for the engineers and knowledge workers who need the extra capabilities in VR, and for the people who want to completely replace their laptop, rather than their tablets!

43. FollowingTheDao ◴[] No.41868588[source]
"It’s a fantastic device to travel with—Be it by train or by plane, it offers an unparalleled opportunity to selectively tune out your environment and sink into an engaging activity like watching a movie or just working on your laptop. "

Lord forgive you have a new unexpected experience while traveling or expose yourself to the underclasses or subject yourself to the shtty social environment you helped create...

44. alt227 ◴[] No.41868967{3}[source]
>if you can touch-type

And for the majority of us that cant?

45. volemo ◴[] No.41871177[source]
At least they were parked.
46. brailsafe ◴[] No.41874429{9}[source]
No I haven't, and I am somewhat curious, but I'm also keeping up with it through some of the swift/apple podcasts and YT channels I follow. For me it's more about the cost, physical overhead, and (apparent) lack of other utility, which all-together would to me be sort of a more involved commitment than some little thing I may or may not ever bring out..

I'd only ever consider bringing something that is nearly invisible to both myself and others in terms of weight and required infrastructure, wouldn't bring anything with me for the purpose of occupying my attention that I can't forget I have, or that would consume more than a negligible amount of space/weight; I'll bring a book, but not a tome

Incidentally, Canadian cross-country trains don't even have outlets at the seat as far as I know; they're quite old sadly.

That said, I buy almost no superfluous electronics for raw consumption, and even an iPad Pro would be wildly out of scope, as nice as they seem to be, since although they do have other utility, I can't picture myself doing more than reading or watching videos. On-the-go entertainment is something I try to keep at arms length so I can spend that time at peace.

Fwiw, I do also hope it doesn't become normalized, not to squash others' potential for fun, but because our existing devices already enable people to protect themselves from social interaction on a large scale, which strikes me as damaging.

replies(1): >>41875428 #
47. brailsafe ◴[] No.41875428{10}[source]
I'd add that this is all really only applies to various modes of commuting and travel, I have no qualms with the device itself, only the idea of using it regularly in-transit.