←back to thread

Reflections on Palantir

(nabeelqu.substack.com)
479 points freditup | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
asdasdsddd ◴[] No.41864951[source]
I worked there in the weird era. A couple things.

1. As per usual, the things that make palantir well known not even close to being the most dubious things.

2. I agree that the rank and file of palantir is no different from typical sv talent.

3. The services -> product transition was cool, I didn't weigh it as much as should've, but I did purchase fomo insurance after they ipo'd

4. The shadow hierarchy was so bad, it's impossible to figure out who you actually needed to talk to.

replies(5): >>41865111 #>>41865768 #>>41866453 #>>41867754 #>>41867811 #
avmich ◴[] No.41865111[source]
It would also be interesting to hear thoughts on the company of somebody like Cory Doctorow.

Edit: aha, found. https://doctorow.medium.com/how-palantir-will-steal-the-nhs-...

"Palantir is one of the most sinister companies on the global stage, a company whose pitch is to sell humans rights abuses as a service. The customers for this turnkey service include America’s most corrupt police departments, who use Palantir’s products to monitor protest movements.

Palantir’s clients also include the Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a federal agency who rely on Palantir’s products for their ethnic cleansing..."

replies(6): >>41865424 #>>41865945 #>>41866147 #>>41866216 #>>41867235 #>>41869329 #
lmz[dead post] ◴[] No.41865424[source]
[flagged]
carom ◴[] No.41865540[source]
It is because corporations benefit from exploitable labor and competition among workers. For this reason they promote a narrative that opposing illegal immigration is racist. The counter narrative would be that preventing it gives power to American workers (of all races) but no one seems to discuss that.
replies(3): >>41866841 #>>41867029 #>>41867771 #
1. pixelatedindex ◴[] No.41867029[source]
I agree on both counts at a high level, but America always had cheap labor. It is what helps us have so much disposable income compared to other countries.
replies(1): >>41872059 #
2. ab5tract ◴[] No.41872059[source]
This is a bizarre take. Corporate towns and company stores and union leader assassinations are all a part of the history of cheap labor in the US.

None of those dynamics contribute to higher incomes for anyone aside from bosses and investors.

But maybe exploitation of cheap labor for personal gains is what you were referring to?