←back to thread

413 points samclemens | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
AlexErrant ◴[] No.41854344[source]
The "Technology Connections" youtube channel recently discussed awnings too. (And it had more or less the same message as this blog.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhbDfi7Ee7k

replies(2): >>41854624 #>>41861875 #
malfist ◴[] No.41854624[source]
And that has way more details than this. The only why supplied here is "we forgot" and "AC"
replies(5): >>41854781 #>>41854800 #>>41855852 #>>41859546 #>>41860062 #
bsder ◴[] No.41855852[source]
I suspect it's not really "forgot". I suspect it's "awnings require ongoing maintenance".
replies(6): >>41856109 #>>41857618 #>>41858139 #>>41858762 #>>41859159 #>>41859342 #
izacus ◴[] No.41859342[source]
Or maybe much more simple and obvious - "they cost to be installed and the developer/builder saved some money on a thing and related labor".

Not sure how its in US, but houses here in some parts of Europe have literally become completely plain white cubes to minimize building costs as much as possible. No more roof overhangs (which brings problems), no more awnings, no decorations, practically no balconies or varied designs. Just sets of suburban white cubes.

replies(2): >>41860087 #>>41860636 #
AngryData ◴[] No.41860636{3}[source]
They are seriously ending the roof right at the wall? That is monumentally stupid and will guarantee a multitude of problems down the line.
replies(2): >>41861225 #>>41864713 #
1. AtlasBarfed ◴[] No.41864713{4}[source]
So if there's a concrete skirt around the entire boundary of the house with a proper slant, wont the water run off properly?