←back to thread

1737 points pseudolus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.288s | source
Show context
ajkjk ◴[] No.41859541[source]
There are so many things like this that have needed fixing for such a long time. The fact that something is happening, even slowly, is so heartening.

If your reaction is wondering if this is legal then you should be interested in the passing of new laws that make it unequivocally legal. Society should be able to govern itself.

replies(7): >>41859610 #>>41859669 #>>41860003 #>>41860390 #>>41861087 #>>41861257 #>>41861766 #
TheCraiggers ◴[] No.41859610[source]
Agreed. The fact that multiple companies are springing up with the main selling point being "help you cancel subscriptions you thought you already cancelled" should be a wake up call to the legislature that this problem has gotten out of hand.
replies(4): >>41859715 #>>41860353 #>>41861231 #>>41861587 #
pc86 ◴[] No.41859715[source]
I think a great function of elected representatives would be keeping an eye out for these types of businesses that are societal "code smells" indicating something is wrong, and looking at the regulatory and legislative environment to see what would be changed to make those businesses obsolete.
replies(5): >>41859734 #>>41859846 #>>41860619 #>>41860779 #>>41861691 #
Pigo ◴[] No.41860779[source]
Still waiting on anything to be done about rent to own businesses. The businesses that rely solely on exploiting the people in a bad position bother me so much, they should at least have some kind of limits on their usury.
replies(1): >>41861391 #
bluGill ◴[] No.41861391[source]
Unfortunately the people they "serve" would get nothing as nobody can afford to lend to a bad credit risk at reasonable rates. Of course a lot of what they are selling are luxuries that people with bad credit shouldn't have, but then we have to ask what the alternative is. (most places have terrible public transit so you have to get such people in a car. You don't need a TV for movies but you can't really live life without internet anymore as many forms assume online and the alternatives don't work well)
replies(2): >>41861631 #>>41862628 #
1. Pigo ◴[] No.41862628[source]
It's hard to argue against that. I suppose it's not that they even exist, it's just the unreasonable amount they profit on the items. If it's purely because they cannot attain items another way, they markup should be more apparent maybe? It just hurts seeing young and disadvantaged people being taken advantage of.