←back to thread

216 points veggieroll | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.47s | source
Show context
lairv ◴[] No.41859815[source]
Hard to see how can Mistral compete with Meta, they have order of magnitude less compute, their models are only slightly better (at least on the benchmarks) with less permissive licenses?
replies(8): >>41860302 #>>41860361 #>>41860373 #>>41860530 #>>41861065 #>>41861206 #>>41861265 #>>41865550 #
simonw ◴[] No.41860302[source]
Yeah, the license thing is definitely a problem. It's hard to get excited about an academic research license for a 3B or 8B model when the Llama 3.1 and 3.2 models are SO good, and are licensed for commercial usage.
replies(2): >>41860447 #>>41860586 #
sigmar ◴[] No.41860586[source]
to be clear- these ministal model are also licensed for commercial use, but not freely licensed for commercial use. and meta also has restrictions on commercial use (have to put “Built with Meta Llama 3” and need to pay meta if you exceed 700 million monthly users)
replies(2): >>41860944 #>>41862359 #
1. sthatipamala ◴[] No.41860944[source]
You need to pay meta if you have 700 million users as of the Llama 3 release date. Not at any time going forward.
replies(1): >>41864049 #
2. simonw ◴[] No.41864049[source]
... or presumably if you build a successful company and then try to sell that company to Apple, Microsoft, Google or a few other huge companies.