←back to thread

400 points dulvui | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.967s | source
Show context
mgoetzke ◴[] No.41857244[source]
it also leaks the audio of tabs before logging in.

Even though I had disabled all 'restore' applications features, macos sometimes decides to 'start' browsers BEFORE logging in after a restart AND those start auto-playing audio from whatever was paused before the reboot (or many days before).

Since then I went rather deep disabling that feature, but I never trusted it.

replies(7): >>41857258 #>>41857358 #>>41857362 #>>41857411 #>>41857615 #>>41857667 #>>41857946 #
Jerrrrrrry ◴[] No.41857362[source]
They want their TCP/IP stack and safari browser hot and ready for their demanders of instant gratification.

In the long run, they barter this goodwill for "Safari is shit" credit until they and Google force the internet until a browser-turned App-Play-Store war.

Both companies win, and can blame the other company - all while incentivising anti-competition behavior and benefiting from their own organizational, yet altruistic, self-interests happening to coincidentally collude in similar, yet distinctly more complicated cases of creating monopolies spanning multiple domains.

The internet was captured, gamified, commoditized, and vertically integrated into a handful of giga-Corps.

your mobile devices are essentially tracking devices you are addicted to, and the government is too interested in these shiny grandiose things and their use in facilitating government functions without any real consequence, they fail to see the systematic risks that they themselves have allowed to proliferate by not enforcing stricter laws for systematically - exploitable intersections of law, technology, and business.

replies(4): >>41857456 #>>41857535 #>>41858196 #>>41859496 #
lukan ◴[] No.41857456[source]
"they fail to see the systematic risks"

Or they also fail at providing a solution. Would you prefer diletantic government intervention in this area instead?

replies(4): >>41857493 #>>41857767 #>>41858381 #>>41861042 #
phoe-krk ◴[] No.41857493[source]
The differences between governments and megacorps are dwindling and the two are becoming much more alike one another. We already live in global technofeudalism.
replies(1): >>41857509 #
eru ◴[] No.41857509[source]
Alas, no. By and large, governments are still vastly less competent than multinational corporations. MNCs also don't force you to pay taxes or buy their products.
replies(10): >>41857522 #>>41857727 #>>41857835 #>>41857887 #>>41858025 #>>41858033 #>>41858148 #>>41858462 #>>41858819 #>>41861859 #
1. phoe-krk ◴[] No.41857522[source]
Governments are adopting the international outreach of megacorps.

Megacorps are adopting the level of competence of governments.

I see no contradiction here.

replies(1): >>41865377 #
2. eru ◴[] No.41865377[source]
> Megacorps are adopting the level of competence of governments.

Any sources for that? From all the studies (and anecdotes) I've seen, MNCs are vastly more competent that most local companies, and the latter are also _usually_ still more competent than government.

replies(1): >>41869783 #
3. phoe-krk ◴[] No.41869783[source]
The post I replied to said:

> By and large, governments are still vastly less competent than multinational corporations.

I just agreed with them. Adopring the level of competence of governments, when governments are not competent, doesn't imply an upward movement.