←back to thread

409 points andreock | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.42s | source
Show context
snvzz ◴[] No.41855590[source]
Cute, but I'll wait for the ESP32-P4 version (RISC-V successor to the now deprecated S line).
replies(3): >>41855687 #>>41855811 #>>41856094 #
auguzanellato ◴[] No.41855687[source]
Not really a successor, they’re different chip lines (more I/O, video engine, more hardware crypto stuff but no wireless capabilities we all know and love from Espressif)
replies(1): >>41856052 #
1. snvzz ◴[] No.41856052[source]
Hmm, I had missed that. Perhaps the C line (e.g. C6) would be more suited.

Espressif CEO expressed commitment to RISC-V (now already years ago) and they've stopped releasing new chips with tensilica ISA.

As the ecosystem, toolchains and such aren't comparable to that of RISC-V and this gap will only widen, they really shouldn't be selected for new designs.

replies(1): >>41856198 #
2. auguzanellato ◴[] No.41856198[source]
C line isn’t also very comparable: single (C-series) vs dual core (S3), and S3 has USB-OTG capabilities whereas C6 only has USB-JTAG.

Tensilica ESPs aren’t formally in NRND stage as of right now, for some usages they’re still the only choice, even if RISC-V is clearly the path forward.