Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    181 points ohjeez | 17 comments | | HN request time: 0.882s | source | bottom
    1. ChocMontePy ◴[] No.41853012[source]
    I need an "Every possible comment by Hacker News users"
    replies(10): >>41853065 #>>41853146 #>>41853206 #>>41853674 #>>41854692 #>>41854713 #>>41854807 #>>41854940 #>>41855304 #>>41858075 #
    2. thechao ◴[] No.41853065[source]
    Having just found out about topic X, and thought about it for 30 seconds, I have strong advice for the world's expert about an edge case they forgot for solutions to topic X.
    replies(1): >>41853312 #
    3. duneisagoodbook ◴[] No.41853146[source]
    I didn't read the article, but--
    4. gherkinnn ◴[] No.41853206[source]
    http://n-gate.com/hackernews/
    replies(4): >>41853791 #>>41854077 #>>41854572 #>>41855555 #
    5. sseagull ◴[] No.41853312[source]
    Man Feels Like He Gets Gist Of Enlightenment After First Few Minutes Of Hearing Zen Monk Talk

    https://theonion.com/man-feels-like-he-gets-gist-of-enlighte...

    6. ◴[] No.41853674[source]
    7. nojs ◴[] No.41853791[source]
    I am very disappointed this stopped
    8. FactKnower69 ◴[] No.41854077[source]
    bizarre fixation on china huh
    9. anigbrowl ◴[] No.41854572[source]
    I really miss this project. It's AI replaceable of course but I'm not sure a computer can pull of the such withering personal attacks.
    10. 123yawaworht456 ◴[] No.41854692[source]
    title: foo

    comment: an essayesque rant about deeply held ideological beliefs that are not even vaguely related to foo

    11. jimmygrapes ◴[] No.41854713[source]
    Your comment does not have a license and even if it did I highly disagree with your interpretation of how it can be both available to all of humanity forever free of all obligation but also I disagree with your monetization scheme, also my partner and I on one of our many hobby vacations have long ago created the solution that sadly was lost to imposter syndrome and inappropriate recycling.
    replies(1): >>41854803 #
    12. ctoth ◴[] No.41854803[source]
    Also the back button doesn't work on your site and it does something really terrible with my scrolling.
    13. skykooler ◴[] No.41854807[source]
    I ran this article through ChatGPT and here are some comments it came up with:
    14. ks2048 ◴[] No.41854940[source]
    Your project looks interesting... But, what's the point, when you can easily accomplish this (and much more) simply by self-hosting XYZ, wrapped by an instance of FOO, backed by a simple cluster of BAR, communicating with a BAZ? Also Rust.
    15. Detrytus ◴[] No.41855304[source]
    "Citation needed."
    16. seabombs ◴[] No.41855555[source]
    Aw man I miss n-gate... Anyone know why they stopped?
    17. beAbU ◴[] No.41858075[source]
    Creator of $COMPETING_PRODUCT here.

    This product is really cool and congrats to the team for pulling this off. The rest of my paragraph is full of euphemisms of why my product is actually better, and why this product is actually shit.

    Top comment on the post