←back to thread

Furilabs Linux Phone

(furilabs.com)
223 points nikodunk | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ninetyninenine ◴[] No.41840028[source]
What I want is quality to the level of flagship android phones or the iphone with the ability to plug it in to a keyboard, mouse and screen and have it function as my laptop as well.

One single integrated experience. I think everyone wants this. We have the technology we have the demand, it's just companies who make the high quality phones want to completely lock down the market.

You would think the free market would produce a company that would tackle this issue but barrier to entry is waay to high so essentially we have small companies trying to get into this space but they are only creating sub-par products because they can't make something as good as an iphone.

It's basically a legal monopoly. Companies can't get into it because the technology and capital required are way to high and only super mega corps like samsung and apple can pull it off...

Closest thing I've seen to this product I'm looking for is the steam deck. I would buy a steam deck phone if it had the quality of a pixel/iphone device.

replies(8): >>41840095 #>>41840315 #>>41840354 #>>41840378 #>>41840391 #>>41840910 #>>41840913 #>>41848042 #
whyowhy3484939 ◴[] No.41840391[source]
> I think everyone wants this.

You asked for it. I don't want that. I don't want an "integrated experience" and "flagship quality". The first sounds juvenile and the second sounds unnecessarily expensive and probably containing shit I don't need, like fancy cameras to look good on my nonexistent socials.

What I want is a simple, slow, old, efficient, simple phone with the interface of an 80s era 8bit computer that can actually, imagine this, make and, to complicate matters even further, even take calls.

I basically want an open source dumb phone. Do these exist? If not, why not focus on this first? Why go for fancy cameras and apps when we can't even make calls? Looking at your PinePhone.

replies(5): >>41840630 #>>41840644 #>>41840745 #>>41840982 #>>41841611 #
dmd ◴[] No.41840745[source]
> that can actually, imagine this, make and, to complicate matters even further, even take calls

Showing how different different people are. I've probably made... 20? ish? phone calls in the last decade. (I'm 46.)

replies(2): >>41840838 #>>41844053 #
MaXtreeM ◴[] No.41840838[source]
Holy moly, you must have very different life than most people I guess. I am from the younger generation which supposedly avoids making old-style phone calls as much as possible and I don't think I know anyone who has made less than 100 calls in the last decade.
replies(1): >>41847879 #
wiz21c ◴[] No.41847879[source]
I always wonder why your generation avoids such calls... Voice calls are so much more efficient to get the things you want from the person you call...
replies(1): >>41847999 #
1. testermelon ◴[] No.41847999[source]
I think those very total attention expected during phone calls, and the speed at which it happens, contributes to a higher level of anxiety compared to texting. The younger generation hate these elevated stresses and prefer more async communication