←back to thread

424 points notamy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
butterfly42069 ◴[] No.41844687[source]
They said he had balls of steel to try that one

For the yanks and elsewhere, yes conkers is well known in Britain. You basically put a chestnut (but its a conker) on a string by making a hole in the middle. Take turns swinging them on the string, whoever's breaks is the loser.

It used to be great fun till it was banned/requires eye protection now. There's an opportunity there, someone could make a perfectly safe conker app. I'm sure that would adequately replace it. /s

replies(2): >>41844738 #>>41844983 #
ungreased0675 ◴[] No.41844983[source]
How is it banned? Banned in schools you mean?

Because I can’t see how authorities could ban anyone from picking up a conker from the ground and tying a string to it.

On a different note, if you’re just pulling a random one out of a bag, what is the competitive aspect? Is there a technique involved? Or just RNG?

replies(2): >>41845002 #>>41845543 #
butterfly42069 ◴[] No.41845543[source]
It is banned in schools. As I said in another comment, that outlaws it for the vast majority of players at the place they used to play it.

Believe it or not adults playing conkers or people playing conkers outside of schools isn't a common pass time.

It is pretty much RNG, though you can massively nerf a conkers structural integrity by making the hole through the middle poorly, so there are some techniques. People also used to use thicker shoelaces like in vans, which I think made the centre more solid. I've never run an experiment to verify the difference that might make.

replies(2): >>41845800 #>>41847474 #
Symbiote ◴[] No.41845800{3}[source]
It's not banned, but the Daily Mail would like you to think the EU banned another British tradition.
replies(1): >>41845842 #
butterfly42069 ◴[] No.41845842{4}[source]
I don't read the daily mail. Try again. Maybe be less partisan.
replies(1): >>41845980 #
blitzar ◴[] No.41845980{5}[source]
Page 3: "Carly 32D, 21 from Ipswich, thinks EU regulations on conkers is against British traditions"
replies(1): >>41846183 #
butterfly42069 ◴[] No.41846183{6}[source]
I'm not sure if that betrays more about your opinion of women than you may have been aware.
replies(2): >>41846383 #>>41847929 #
blitzar ◴[] No.41846383{7}[source]
It probably betrays more about my contempt for how peoples biggotry is exploited to make them believe things that are not true. When that is not enough then show them some tits with the message and they will tell you all about how pigs fly.
replies(2): >>41846580 #>>41846638 #
1. butterfly42069 ◴[] No.41846638{8}[source]
I sincerely hope life starts treating you better than it clearly has.

I also hope you see the irony of your ways.