Most active commenters
  • butterfly42069(8)
  • blitzar(4)
  • robertlagrant(3)

←back to thread

424 points notamy | 33 comments | | HN request time: 2.676s | source | bottom
1. butterfly42069 ◴[] No.41844687[source]
They said he had balls of steel to try that one

For the yanks and elsewhere, yes conkers is well known in Britain. You basically put a chestnut (but its a conker) on a string by making a hole in the middle. Take turns swinging them on the string, whoever's breaks is the loser.

It used to be great fun till it was banned/requires eye protection now. There's an opportunity there, someone could make a perfectly safe conker app. I'm sure that would adequately replace it. /s

replies(2): >>41844738 #>>41844983 #
2. bee_rider ◴[] No.41844738[source]
So the game is to test who has the stronger conker by hitting them into each-other?
replies(1): >>41844791 #
3. CJefferson ◴[] No.41844791[source]
Yes, that's it.

The reason I think this game is so popular is horse chestnut trees are very popular in the UK. For about a month each year, where I grew up the ground would be littered with conkers, both on my route to school and on school grounds. It's natural when walking around to try to find particularly large / impressive looking ones.

replies(1): >>41844808 #
4. seanhunter ◴[] No.41844981{4}[source]
I have no idea why you think safety laws prevent people from playing conkers in spite of the very thread you are commenting on being evidence that people play conkers and it is perfectly legal.
replies(2): >>41845395 #>>41845518 #
5. ungreased0675 ◴[] No.41844983[source]
How is it banned? Banned in schools you mean?

Because I can’t see how authorities could ban anyone from picking up a conker from the ground and tying a string to it.

On a different note, if you’re just pulling a random one out of a bag, what is the competitive aspect? Is there a technique involved? Or just RNG?

replies(2): >>41845002 #>>41845543 #
6. Nursie ◴[] No.41845002[source]
IIRC at some point schools decided to put a stop to it (it was a popular playground game in Autumn) because of the possibility of injury.

Or that might have just been a tabloid outrage-bait headline.

replies(1): >>41845085 #
7. ascorbic ◴[] No.41845085{3}[source]
It's such a persistent myth that a health and safety organisation decided to sponsor the championships to try and debunk the idea. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7637605.stm
replies(1): >>41854919 #
8. Timwi ◴[] No.41845245{4}[source]
I would assume you got downvoted because you feel for a particularly implausible myth.
replies(1): >>41845580 #
9. PhasmaFelis ◴[] No.41845308{4}[source]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7637605.stm
10. timthorn ◴[] No.41845395{5}[source]
It is legal, but it also did get banned at my primary school. It continued to be played.
replies(1): >>41846551 #
11. butterfly42069 ◴[] No.41845518{5}[source]
Well it is banned in schools. I'm not sure how many adults you believe actually play conkers, beyond a few nutters (sic), but its mainly been banned for the people that used to actually enjoy it, kids.

I do wonder if by banning it in schools it will get less and less common till it disappears. I suppose you predictably think that's nonsense.

But pedantry aside, its banned for the people who used to play it most and enjoy it, at the place they did just that.

replies(1): >>41845810 #
12. butterfly42069 ◴[] No.41845543[source]
It is banned in schools. As I said in another comment, that outlaws it for the vast majority of players at the place they used to play it.

Believe it or not adults playing conkers or people playing conkers outside of schools isn't a common pass time.

It is pretty much RNG, though you can massively nerf a conkers structural integrity by making the hole through the middle poorly, so there are some techniques. People also used to use thicker shoelaces like in vans, which I think made the centre more solid. I've never run an experiment to verify the difference that might make.

replies(2): >>41845800 #>>41847474 #
13. butterfly42069 ◴[] No.41845580{5}[source]
Indeed, a myth. One "disproven" by BBC news articles from 2008 when I have seen contrary evidence with my own eyes.

Believe it or not the world has come on a long way in 16 years.

14. Symbiote ◴[] No.41845800{3}[source]
It's not banned, but the Daily Mail would like you to think the EU banned another British tradition.
replies(1): >>41845842 #
15. Symbiote ◴[] No.41845810{6}[source]
You're downvoted because you're repeating unfounded tabloid rage-bait, hours after someone else posted a reliable source showing the opposite.
replies(1): >>41845853 #
16. butterfly42069 ◴[] No.41845842{4}[source]
I don't read the daily mail. Try again. Maybe be less partisan.
replies(1): >>41845980 #
17. butterfly42069 ◴[] No.41845853{7}[source]
Ah yes your experience of a 2008 BBC news article from Copenhagen outweighs my lived, witnessed reality.

How could I be so clueless?

18. blitzar ◴[] No.41845980{5}[source]
Page 3: "Carly 32D, 21 from Ipswich, thinks EU regulations on conkers is against British traditions"
replies(1): >>41846183 #
19. blitzar ◴[] No.41846001{4}[source]
A quick google will get you websites of primary schools up and down this great nation with photos of their Conkers champions holding up their trophies.

As for "the law" - from a 2019 petition to make conkers legal again:

There's no law or government policy banning children from playing conkers, so we're not sure exactly what you'd like the Government or Parliament to do.

https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/238105

20. butterfly42069 ◴[] No.41846183{6}[source]
I'm not sure if that betrays more about your opinion of women than you may have been aware.
replies(2): >>41846383 #>>41847929 #
21. blitzar ◴[] No.41846383{7}[source]
It probably betrays more about my contempt for how peoples biggotry is exploited to make them believe things that are not true. When that is not enough then show them some tits with the message and they will tell you all about how pigs fly.
replies(2): >>41846580 #>>41846638 #
22. red_admiral ◴[] No.41846551{6}[source]
Conkers, bulldog, smoking behind the bike sheds (ok vaping these days), and porn (nowadays on screens rather than naughty magazines) ... a lot about British schools can be summed up in this quote:

“What exactly are you so happy about?' Harry asked her.'Oh Harry, don't you see?' Hermione breathed. 'If she could have done one thing to make absolutely sure that every single person in this school will read your interview, it was banning it!”

replies(1): >>41847485 #
23. robertlagrant ◴[] No.41846580{8}[source]
It just looks as though you have your own set of biases, just against people instead of against overly coddling rules. No one's mentioned the Daily Mail or the EU other than you and the other poster with similar biases.
replies(1): >>41846644 #
24. butterfly42069 ◴[] No.41846638{8}[source]
I sincerely hope life starts treating you better than it clearly has.

I also hope you see the irony of your ways.

25. blitzar ◴[] No.41846644{9}[source]
The "legislation against playing conkers" is demonstrably false.
replies(1): >>41847106 #
26. hardlianotion ◴[] No.41846735{4}[source]
I haven't lost an eye to a conker, but I did laugh.

EDIT: And now I feel guilty for doing so.

27. robertlagrant ◴[] No.41847106{10}[source]
You're writing that as though you're quoting someone. Where are you quoting that from?
replies(1): >>41847919 #
28. philipwhiuk ◴[] No.41847474{3}[source]
I doubt it's banned in all schools. It'll be banned in a few which made headlines.

The HSE is pretty clear it doesn't justify it:

> The HSE said the safety risk from playing conkers was "incredibly low and not worth bothering about"

29. philipwhiuk ◴[] No.41847485{7}[source]
And they are generally banned in 1 school from one incident by one head trying to quell anger from parents.

The ban is generally lifted or just not enforced at all after a year or two.

For starters the playground monitors have more important stuff to do than remember the list of banned activities and try to enforce them.

30. SteveSmith16384 ◴[] No.41847919{11}[source]
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/dangerous-daffodils-and-1...
replies(1): >>41867484 #
31. SteveSmith16384 ◴[] No.41847929{7}[source]
I think they were just parodying the typical text that used to be shown against a page 3 girl bitd.
32. Nursie ◴[] No.41854919{4}[source]
Interesting!

I have a weird memory of seeing kids in safety glasses on the tv sometime around the turn of the century…

Looks like, as with all good myths, there’s a kernel of something resembling a twisted half-truth that got blown up out of hand - https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/dec/09/conker...

33. robertlagrant ◴[] No.41867484{12}[source]
But not anyone in this conversation, though? I'm not sure "someone said this on the internet" is a reason to respond to it.