←back to thread

352 points keithly | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
pavel_lishin ◴[] No.41842453[source]
I'm going to also throw anecdotes into the bucket: three dentists completely missed a cavity on one of my rear molars (wisdom teeth) until I mentioned pain, and then they poked around physically and said, "oh yeah, that's a big one."
replies(3): >>41842483 #>>41842717 #>>41842810 #
bsimpson ◴[] No.41842717[source]
Your anecdote corroborates one of the key points in the article:

> For instance, a 2021 systemic review of 77 studies that included data on a total of 15,518 tooth sites or surfaces found that using X-rays to detect early tooth decay led to a high degree of false-negative results. In other words, it led to missed cases.

The article isn't just saying you're getting unnecessary radiation. It's also saying that relying on x-rays lets dentists be lazy about finding problems while also billing you for unnecessary work.

replies(1): >>41844101 #
1. Ferret7446 ◴[] No.41844101[source]
Does it catch cases though? If so, it doesn't mean it isn't worth it just because it misses cases.

Also, this may be a good application for AI. I would assume this is an issue with dentists being able to read X-rays carefully and not that the X-rays are unable to capture the signs.