←back to thread

217 points mfiguiere | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.218s | source
Show context
quantified ◴[] No.41842362[source]
Surprising absolutely no one, I hope. Credibility seems difficult to generate for Tesla events. Maybe the secret sauce for Robotaxis is a human driver somewhere watching the cameras. Like driving Uber but from the comfort of home, and it's easy to hit the fridge or bathroom between rides.
replies(6): >>41842852 #>>41843217 #>>41843571 #>>41843760 #>>41844492 #>>41844573 #
wokwokwok ◴[] No.41843760[source]
I mean, shoot me down here, but is it that bad of an idea?

If you're going to have an assistant or a taxi driver, and you start off at the base position of "AI is totally unreliable", then having a fully remote gig-worker remotely piloting your robot...

I mean, it doesn't seem like a massive stretch from what Uber does.

...and heck, having a 'remote robot body' is pretty cool tech.

I guess. As long as you don't use it to pretend its just AI for the meaningless purposes of generating hype about your AI that really isn't actually any good.

replies(3): >>41843795 #>>41843841 #>>41844033 #
1. FactKnower69 ◴[] No.41843795[source]
>but is it that bad of an idea?

yes, operating any kind of heavy machinery over a shaky wireless WAN with hundreds of milliseconds of latency and multiple percentage packet loss is, in fact, a bad idea