←back to thread

The quiet art of attention

(billwear.github.io)
865 points billwear | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mistermann ◴[] No.41829740[source]
As much as I love the sentiment, these sorts of pieces (written or verbal) always contain contradictions, usually important ones relative to the claims.
replies(2): >>41829985 #>>41831299 #
keybored ◴[] No.41829985[source]
These contradictions (?) may be rooted in the reader’s assumptions about the world: the writer says A and B, but to the reader B implies (not A) because of their world view. In short they might not be actual contradictions.

This might seem very vague but a discussion on something so first-person as the mind is ripe for that kind of thing.

Which is resolved with dialogue. If the contradictions are brought up.

replies(1): >>41831825 #
mistermann ◴[] No.41831825[source]
> Which is resolved with dialogue. If the contradictions are brought up.

In my experience noting contradictions usually leads to evasive memes and anger/unhappiness.

replies(1): >>41835512 #
keybored ◴[] No.41835512[source]
Then mum’s the word.
replies(1): >>41837838 #
1. mistermann ◴[] No.41837838{4}[source]
Cutting off access to an entire region of potential upward utility...perhaps permanently if no one is willing to fight the consensus.
replies(1): >>41838468 #
2. keybored ◴[] No.41838468[source]
I don’t understand what you are saying.
replies(1): >>41842419 #
3. mistermann ◴[] No.41842419[source]
Contradiction is socially disruptive, and ignored/policed quite thoroughly, denying access to Humans of pretty substantial portions of reality which is instead represented by illusory proxies/heuristics.
replies(1): >>41849421 #
4. keybored ◴[] No.41849421{3}[source]
You’re talking in riddles even more than the most hermit mindfulness practitioner.
replies(1): >>41853318 #
5. mistermann ◴[] No.41853318{4}[source]
An example: if religion shut down early practitioners of science, do you believe humanity would have missed out on any valuable knowledge?

Or, how about if science had only received 1% of the total funding it has?