←back to thread

420 points rvz | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.701s | source
Show context
joejohnson ◴[] No.41409095[source]
Hopefully most people migrate to one of the alternatives not owned by an American oligarch
replies(1): >>41409158 #
adventured ◴[] No.41409158[source]
There are no possible alternatives to US based services unless you enjoy extreme restrictions on speech. Europe has become a big no-go zone for speech over the past decade, they're outright hostile and authoritarian about it (with only a few exceptions among European nations). And the direction re liberalism and human rights in Europe is overwhelmingly hostile toward speech. And for South America, Africa and Asia you can entirely forget about it, there are no reliable speech protected locations in any of those.
replies(3): >>41409176 #>>41409219 #>>41409264 #
mstipetic[dead post] ◴[] No.41409219[source]
[flagged]
hybrid_study ◴[] No.41412995[source]
this is called Popper's Tolerance Paradox, and you are quite right.

it's truly amazing how many people dont really get that having only 99% free speech is just fine

replies(2): >>41413140 #>>41413347 #
semiquaver ◴[] No.41413140[source]
99% of speech is bland and unobjectionable. It’s the 1% that needs protection.
replies(3): >>41413371 #>>41413428 #>>41413657 #
1. myko ◴[] No.41413371[source]
i disagree, for example holocaust denial is not allowed in Germany and that seems reasonable and to work well

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/germanys-laws-ant...

replies(3): >>41414308 #>>41414310 #>>41414368 #
2. computerfriend ◴[] No.41414308[source]
It doesn't seem reasonable or work well to the holocaust deniers.
3. WrongAssumption ◴[] No.41414368[source]
Did you read the article you posted? It doesn’t sound like it’s working well at all.
replies(1): >>41461789 #
4. myko ◴[] No.41461789[source]
Having lived in Germany and the US I disagree with your assessment of the situation