←back to thread

210 points benbreen | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
lholden ◴[] No.41084741[source]
My mom lived in a historical house when she was a kid in the 60s. Since then, the house has become a museum. There are a lot of "artifacts" on display that "came from the 1800s" that are actually just toys my moms brothers made. My mom got a good laugh about it when she took me to visit the place.

I'm sure these finds must have dated in some way to verify the authenticity, but I always think back to seeing my uncles toys on display as if they were historical artifacts when I see stuff like this.

replies(3): >>41084811 #>>41084973 #>>41085586 #
bdjsiqoocwk ◴[] No.41084811[source]
Has your mom got in touch with the museum to tell them that, so they can improve? If not why not?
replies(2): >>41085135 #>>41119839 #
hsbauauvhabzb ◴[] No.41085135[source]
It’s not their mothers responsibility to correct their incompetence, or (imo) more likely negligence and information falsification.
replies(2): >>41085229 #>>41085585 #
bdjsiqoocwk ◴[] No.41085585[source]
A) I didn't say it was their responsibility

B) I don't wanna assume malice where incompetence will do

replies(1): >>41086382 #
hsbauauvhabzb ◴[] No.41086382[source]
If you walked into a old house and found a random toy, would you automatically assume the toy is as old as the house?
replies(1): >>41086534 #
bdjsiqoocwk ◴[] No.41086534[source]
If you saw something broken that's not your responsibility would you fix it?

I know the answer in your case, but believe me that a lot of people would.

replies(2): >>41089609 #>>41091148 #
hsbauauvhabzb ◴[] No.41091148[source]
> If you saw something broken that's not your responsibility would you fix it?

If it were a genuine mistake and not fraudulent, yes.

> I know the answer in your case, but believe me that a lot of people would.

Weren’t you just talking about not assuming malice?

replies(1): >>41094456 #
bdjsiqoocwk ◴[] No.41094456[source]
I wasn't assuming malice from you, I was assuming that either too lazy or too self-centered. No malice.

You can't get one in today huh.

replies(1): >>41095288 #
1. hsbauauvhabzb ◴[] No.41095288[source]
I’m not sure that you see my point.