I'm sure these finds must have dated in some way to verify the authenticity, but I always think back to seeing my uncles toys on display as if they were historical artifacts when I see stuff like this.
I'm sure these finds must have dated in some way to verify the authenticity, but I always think back to seeing my uncles toys on display as if they were historical artifacts when I see stuff like this.
B) I don't wanna assume malice where incompetence will do
I know the answer in your case, but believe me that a lot of people would.
In my country, if a business makes a factual claim about its products, it has to have already verified the correctness of it to some reasonable level and have the documentation so show that. There's no room for this "oh, I just assumed it was true because I'm incompetent" excuse.
What I can see is the case is that you're both way too confident in your inferences for a bunch of mind readers. Why not just call them up and find out? Oh right "not my job".
And btw "no X could be that Y" last time I heard that line was in a sitcom.
If it were a genuine mistake and not fraudulent, yes.
> I know the answer in your case, but believe me that a lot of people would.
Weren’t you just talking about not assuming malice?
You can't get one in today huh.