←back to thread

960 points andrew918277 | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.972s | source
Show context
romankolpak ◴[] No.40716163[source]
I’m sorry if this is a stupid question, but I want to ask it because I see the same sentiment across HN and other forums and I’m legitimately confused.

If we don’t hijack privacy in messaging, how do we fight crime happening on a message platform? If government doesn’t have access to message contents, what’s stopping criminals from using the platform and never get tracked down? Or proven guilty, since all the proof is safely encrypted? Aren’t we hurting ourselves by being so obsessed with privacy? Again, I apologize for ignorance and am curious

replies(16): >>40716180 #>>40716181 #>>40716191 #>>40716194 #>>40716221 #>>40716267 #>>40716277 #>>40716364 #>>40716453 #>>40716456 #>>40716500 #>>40716705 #>>40717026 #>>40722811 #>>40724777 #>>40724839 #
wepple ◴[] No.40716267[source]
Crime, whether CSAM or drugs or theft, all have a component in the real-world: it’s never purely in messaging.

Stop the CSAM where it’s being created. Catch the drug manufacturers and distributors. Etc. do police work.

replies(2): >>40716514 #>>40716544 #
1. tzs ◴[] No.40716544[source]
What kind of police work are you envisaging?
replies(2): >>40718333 #>>40726806 #
2. ranguna ◴[] No.40718333[source]
The one being done right now without this law
3. account42 ◴[] No.40726806[source]
Well for one, the FBI could investigate the list of Epstein's clients which they almost certainly have.
replies(1): >>40728467 #
4. tekknik ◴[] No.40728467[source]
You’ve jumped the pond, this article is about Europe not the US
replies(1): >>40728594 #
5. account42 ◴[] No.40728594{3}[source]
It's an example. You don't think Interpol and individual EU countries' police have similar options?

The fact that these things often end up brushed under the rug makes me doubt that the goal here is really to catch abusers.