←back to thread

Chat Control Must Be Stopped – Now

(threema.ch)
960 points andrew918277 | 1 comments | 18 Jun 24 08:49 UTC | HN request time: 0.218s | source
Show context
neugiergiraffe ◴[18 Jun 24 10:16 UTC] No.40715951[source]▶
Can someone explain to me why, over time, democratic states tend to drift into mass surveillance ?

Is it beacuse a lot of people feel unsafe or is it because the people supposed to ensure our security see it as the "easiest" or most effective way to do their job?

Is there so much benefit to having a fuctioning mass surveilance apparatus, and if yes, who benefits of it if not the people for whom these rules for in the first place?

replies(12): >>40716008 #>>40716012 #>>40716024 #>>40716063 #>>40716116 #>>40716268 #>>40716270 #>>40716315 #>>40717203 #>>40717287 #>>40724897 #>>40726478 #
1. cl3misch ◴[18 Jun 24 10:40 UTC] No.40716116[source]▶
> democratic states tend to drift into mass surveillance

I am not saying this is false, but think about the inverse: are there non-democratic states never drifting into mass surveillance? Maybe it is a symptom of a developed, high-trust society.

Which doesn't make mass surveillance a good thing. I'm just contemplating whether it's even possible to turn out different.