←back to thread

585 points mocko | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
zecho ◴[] No.4023608[source]
On one hand, this is a momentous day for private space flight. On the other, we're closer to Moon lobbyists than ever.
replies(2): >>4023668 #>>4023669 #
ConstantineXVI ◴[] No.4023669[source]
If we had moon lobbyists, at least NASA would get better funding. I'd take moon lobbying over coal/oil/defense/farming/etc. any day.
replies(2): >>4023857 #>>4025442 #
CWuestefeld ◴[] No.4023857[source]
I think part of the problem is that we're willing to accept bad behavior when it's done on behalf of the team we agree with.

If something is bad, then it's bad even when it's done by your team.

The end does not justify the means.

replies(2): >>4023964 #>>4024863 #
rmassie ◴[] No.4023964[source]
Can anyone tell me why lobbying is inherently bad?
replies(7): >>4024010 #>>4024088 #>>4024090 #>>4024093 #>>4024708 #>>4024768 #>>4025138 #
1. ep103 ◴[] No.4024088{3}[source]
There is no problem with private economic interests consulting government. It is in the interest of society for government officials to hear what is best for the economy from the major economic organizations.

Lobbying is berated because economic organizations should not be granted larger influence on governmental officials than the people en mass in a democratic republic, and most people would argue that is the current state in the US.

replies(1): >>4024326 #
2. drumdance ◴[] No.4024326[source]
It's a self-reinforcing thing. Corporations don't hire lobbyists until their interests are threatened by government. For example, Microsoft didn't start giving money to Congress until the DOJ started investigating them. Same for Google.

Once a company invests in lobbying, lobbyists have an incentive to keep clients on retainer, so they look for rent-seeking opportunities that they can justify on an ROI basis. Hence all the shenanigans around taxes. Spending $500k on a lobbyist to save $1 million in taxes is a no-brainer.