←back to thread

380 points rezonant | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
kevingadd ◴[] No.40207559[source]
I'm genuinely surprised by this. I figured the differences between tablets and phones, combined with Apple's efforts to distinguish between 'iPadOS' and 'iOS', would be enough to get them a win on this point. If the shared app store is part of the problem I wonder if that makes it a liability for any new apple ecosystem to tie into the App Store, like Vision OS for example.
replies(5): >>40207618 #>>40207698 #>>40208317 #>>40208677 #>>40208796 #
kvdveer ◴[] No.40207618[source]
Why would IpadOS not be held to the same DSA rules as IOS? Apple has applied the same model of gatekeeping (walled garden) to both the iPhone and the iPad. DSA attaches requirements to the gatekeepers if they are big enough.

Software similarity and market positioning don't really come into consideration once the role of gatekeeper has been established.

replies(3): >>40207638 #>>40207733 #>>40209124 #
threeseed[dead post] ◴[] No.40207638[source]
[flagged]
1. prmoustache ◴[] No.40207809{3}[source]
> In this case the iPad is actually not big enough but the EU has chosen to regulate anyway.

They just realized that Apple was full of shit and trying to circumvent the law by differenciating iPadOS and iOS in the same arbitrary way you think the EU is working.

It is rarely a good strategy to play the smart ass in front of authority.