←back to thread

380 points rezonant | 1 comments | | HN request time: 1.246s | source
Show context
kevingadd ◴[] No.40207559[source]
I'm genuinely surprised by this. I figured the differences between tablets and phones, combined with Apple's efforts to distinguish between 'iPadOS' and 'iOS', would be enough to get them a win on this point. If the shared app store is part of the problem I wonder if that makes it a liability for any new apple ecosystem to tie into the App Store, like Vision OS for example.
replies(5): >>40207618 #>>40207698 #>>40208317 #>>40208677 #>>40208796 #
kvdveer ◴[] No.40207618[source]
Why would IpadOS not be held to the same DSA rules as IOS? Apple has applied the same model of gatekeeping (walled garden) to both the iPhone and the iPad. DSA attaches requirements to the gatekeepers if they are big enough.

Software similarity and market positioning don't really come into consideration once the role of gatekeeper has been established.

replies(3): >>40207638 #>>40207733 #>>40209124 #
threeseed[dead post] ◴[] No.40207638[source]
[flagged]
codetrotter ◴[] No.40207690[source]
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_...

They had valid reasons for it.

replies(1): >>40207709 #
threeseed ◴[] No.40207709[source]
It doesn't change the fact that it's arbitrary at this point.

There are no rules that are governing what is or isn't a gatekeeper. It's just whatever EC decides that day.

replies(4): >>40207751 #>>40207765 #>>40209037 #>>40209085 #
1. lastdong ◴[] No.40207751[source]
I believe it follows the Digital Markets Act (DMA), a European Union legislation designed to promote fairness and competition in digital markets. You can find more information here: https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/index_en