←back to thread

From S3 to R2: An economic opportunity

(dansdatathoughts.substack.com)
274 points dangoldin | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.963s | source
Show context
josevalerio ◴[] No.38121710[source]
Here’s a tweet from Corey Quinn describing how bonkers R2 pricing is:

> let’s remember that the internet is 1-to-many. If 1 million people download that 1GB this month, my cost with @cloudflare R2 this way rounds up to 13¢. With @awscloud S3 it’s $59,247.52.

https://x.com/quinnypig/status/1443076111651401731?s=46

replies(3): >>38122057 #>>38122482 #>>38122565 #
stingraycharles ◴[] No.38122482[source]
To be fair, 1 million downloads @ 1GB is a lot of data transfer. CloudFlare is likely losing money on this.
replies(4): >>38123072 #>>38123392 #>>38124960 #>>38126351 #
pier25 ◴[] No.38123392[source]
Why would they?

Cloudflare doesn't pay for egress and neither does AWS.

replies(1): >>38123800 #
stingraycharles ◴[] No.38123800[source]
But their egress capacity is limited, not? We're talking about 1PB per month here. If every customer of them would be paying only 13 cents a month and pushing out 1PB per month, wouldn't they need to significantly upgrade their hardware and lose money in the process?
replies(3): >>38124132 #>>38125354 #>>38133231 #
1. qaq ◴[] No.38124132[source]
They are already serving roughly 20% of internet traffic as is so there is some natural limit to this whole thing.
replies(1): >>38124680 #
2. eastdakota ◴[] No.38124680[source]
Yup. Bandwidth at scale is effectively free.

The greatest trick AWS ever pulled was convincing the world you needed to pay for bandwidth.

replies(1): >>38124907 #
3. 55555 ◴[] No.38124907[source]
Well you’ve won me over.
replies(1): >>38128952 #
4. Sai_ ◴[] No.38128952{3}[source]
Just as an fyi, eastDakota is in Cloudflare’s executive team. Think he’s their CEO.

Not saying not to trust him - he’s probably a very reasonable and standup guy - but you should know this about him before taking his word on a topic like this.

No disrespect @eastDakota