←back to thread

Hacker News Guidelines

(news.ycombinator.com)
446 points tonmoy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
NaOH ◴[] No.37252829[source]
Here or elsewhere I’ve long followed these rules for commenting:

1. Be respectful.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Move the conversation forward. This sounds like a repetition of #2 but there is often a distinction in that, say, a discussion about a new product feature is likely not the time to discuss the company’s history with features. Going in that direction is moving the conversation sideways.

4. Provide supporting evidence for what is said. Claiming something like, “I’d never buy this from Company X” is a baseless statement compared to “I’d never buy this from Company X because A, B, and C are an indication I won’t get much support beyond the 90-day warranty and that’s not enough at that price point.” The trick I use for this is to include a word like because since it compels an explanation.

5. Avoid attempts at humor. For one, text mediums like HN can easily lead to misinterpretations; there are many people reading for whom English is a second language, so being clever can cause confusion for those readers; if my humor were so good to be worthwhile for the amount of readers a place like HN has then I should be a comedian. I'm not a comedian.

replies(6): >>37252990 #>>37253062 #>>37253103 #>>37253215 #>>37254302 #>>37255248 #
Uehreka ◴[] No.37253103[source]
My most upvoted comment on HN by a mile was a joke about Siri. A lot of my other most upvoted comments are either jokes or humorous exaggerations or other silly stuff.

The guidelines may say that humor should be avoided, but the readership (the people who, in the end, decide what HN is) seems to disagree.

replies(14): >>37253239 #>>37253356 #>>37253403 #>>37253427 #>>37253464 #>>37253503 #>>37253527 #>>37253605 #>>37253660 #>>37253994 #>>37254175 #>>37254363 #>>37254663 #>>37258949 #
1. mindcrime ◴[] No.37253503[source]
The guidelines may say that humor should be avoided, but the readership (the people who, in the end, decide what HN is) seems to disagree.

In my experience here (and I have been around a while), the actual case is that some humor is welcome here. But the subset of what is welcomed on HN, versus the set of "all things someone finds humorous", is pretty small. I've had humorous comments upvoted before, even highly so. But there's a pretty particular brand of humor that seems to work here. And you can't always predict how something will be received.

I will say this: some of my most highly upvoted comments are among some of my lowest effort ones (eg, something like "Fuck these guys. The NSA can go go hell" or similar) while I've had tons of comments that I spent half an hour or more working on, doing researching, finding citations, etc.... and they either got zero votes, or got downvoted.

My point is that it's really hard to guess how people will react to any particular comment here, humorous or otherwise, on any particular day.