←back to thread

322 points atomroflbomber | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
lelag ◴[] No.36983601[source]
If 2023 ends up giving us AGI, room-temperature superconductors, Starships and a cure for cancer, I think we will able to call it a good year...
replies(10): >>36983623 #>>36984116 #>>36984118 #>>36984549 #>>36986942 #>>36987008 #>>36987250 #>>36987546 #>>36987577 #>>36992261 #
azinman2 ◴[] No.36986942[source]
We’re not getting AGI anytime soon…
replies(6): >>36987177 #>>36987360 #>>36987472 #>>36987477 #>>36987541 #>>36987759 #
AbrahamParangi ◴[] No.36987177[source]
What exactly is your definition of a AGI? Because we’re already passing the Turing test, and so I have to wonder if this isn’t just moving the goalposts.
replies(5): >>36987466 #>>36987583 #>>36988222 #>>36988633 #>>36989206 #
cubefox ◴[] No.36987583[source]
ChatGPT (instruction tuned autoregressive language models) indeed already seems quite general (it's good at conversation Turing tests without faking it like ELIZA), even if the absolute intelligence is limited. Level of generality and intelligence is not the same. Something could be quite narrow but very intelligent (AlphaGo) or quite general but dumb overall (small kid, insect).

Okay, ChatGPT is only text-to-text, but Google & Co are adding more modalities now, including images, audio and robotics. I think one missing step is to fuse training and inference regime into one, just as in animals. That probably requires something else than the usual transformer-based token predictors.

replies(6): >>36987787 #>>36987803 #>>36988173 #>>36988756 #>>36988809 #>>36989041 #
TylerE ◴[] No.36988809[source]
One distinction I would make is that at true AGI should have internet access and be able to query for updated information, instead of being stuck in the time moment it's trained.
replies(3): >>36989054 #>>36989781 #>>36998596 #
1. 98codes ◴[] No.36989781[source]
I'd say the opposite -- compare it to us: if you take away our internet we get cranky, but we don't lose all ability to think intelligently.
replies(1): >>36989809 #
2. TylerE ◴[] No.36989809[source]
Imagine if someone took away your speech, hearing, TV, radio, newspaper, and the ability to order new books - you only had access to the knowledge you already have. You're only allowed to communicate via serial terminal, and can only respond, not initiate.
replies(1): >>36998606 #
3. cubefox ◴[] No.36998606[source]
Bing Chat already accepts images as input. AutoGPT can initiate.