My overall take on this is people have a weird relationship with reddit.
This all strikes me as Reddit and in particular their senior leadership being deeply scared. They know they probably missed the mark for IPO, they could have done it during phases of massive growth a number of years ago, or perhaps in the recently concluded tech IPO boom, but they didn't. They're now shit-scared that they are falling out of favour and losing the support of thought-leaders in the community. I'm sure user/revenue numbers are looking better than ever, but I'm also sure that the leading metrics are showing the valuable users abandoning ship and retention metrics starting to turn.
It's unfortunately unlikely to get better if they keep taking this reactionary approach, but doing anything else is a much harder move that requires strong leadership, and they've never been known for having strong leadership, except perhaps under Ellen.
"...This involves regularly monitoring and addressing content in ModQueue and ModMail and, if possible, actively engaging with your community via posts, comments, and voting."
Intentional sabotage is the only option left at this point.
Private, as in a personal subreddit that can be read by others but not posted to.
And private in the sense that the subreddit is not viewable to the world at large.
In this case, the subreddit was previously "private-as-in-personal", but not "private-as-in-not-viewable". Following the Reddit Strike, I'd taken it private-as-in-not-viewable.
As my Fediverse toot notes, I'd been very aware that Reddit could reclaim the subreddit according to its rules then in place. The pinned posts on the sub, for 2 and 3 years respectively as of this past February, discussed that amongst other concerns. The Wayback Machine shows those here:
<https://web.archive.org/web/20220224161047/https://old.reddi...>
One of those posts specifically addressed my preferences for how my subreddit should allowed to die and rest in ... ouch, typo, "piece". That post received an admin response saying that it would be a good candidate for just that.
<https://web.archive.org/web/20230612102634/https://old.reddi...>
(I'm OP in the event it's not obvious.)
The fact that Reddit is taking drastic action against users who aren't breaking any rules is a pretty strong sign that Reddit's leadership has gone off the deep end.
Yeah, and most recently we're seeing mostly one side. Reddit needs mods. But mods need Reddit. And both need users. Take any one of those three things away and the whole thing doesn't really work.
https://old.reddit.com/r/ModSupport/comments/14faqrt/is_redd...
Same for always-NSFW.
https://old.reddit.com/r/ModCoord/comments/14fjbtt/our_subre...
Power-tripping mods are the ones trying to tank the subreddits.
The communities that actually ask the users for feedback on what they want tend to all be back to normal.
- https://gizmodo.com/reddit-ceo-steve-huffman-moderators-land...
- https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/reddit-protest-blacko...
Or the absolutely abysmal and tonedeaf responses every chance they had?
- https://www.reddit.com/r/reddit/comments/145bram/addressing_...
- https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/9/23755640/reddit-api-change...
- https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/15/23762501/reddit-ceo-steve...
Or the easily disproven libel? https://www.reddit.com/r/apolloapp/comments/143sho8/admins_c...
That's been doubled and tripled down on? https://techcrunch.com/2023/06/09/reddit-ceo-doubles-down-on...
Or literally changing or removing user's posts and comments? https://www.reddit.com/r/ModCoord/comments/14fafpp/the_admin...
That all sounds abusive to me. If anything, the API price was the straw and focusing on it and ignoring literally everything that happened since is just being disingenuous.
I got the same modmail message, even though I barely have 20 subscribers to that sub-reddit and it has been private since they dropped CNAME for a sub-reddit support.
https://amp.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jun/20/how-john-...