Most active commenters
  • jacquesm(5)
  • tough(5)
  • gtirloni(4)
  • arp242(3)

←back to thread

160 points MattIPv4 | 29 comments | | HN request time: 2.624s | source | bottom
Show context
mirzap ◴[] No.36407575[source]
I'm incredibly pleased about Microsoft's acquisition of Github, as I notice visible improvements every passing month. Considering Gitlab's pricing, I wonder why anyone would abandon GitHub Team or Enterprise plan in favor of Gitlab. Gitlab's costs are exorbitant, and they resemble Atlassian products, with an overwhelming number of features that are rarely used, cluttering the interface and diminishing the overall user experience.
replies(9): >>36407665 #>>36407684 #>>36407774 #>>36407852 #>>36408104 #>>36408109 #>>36408163 #>>36408243 #>>36408338 #
1. jacquesm ◴[] No.36407684[source]
I'm not. The biggest enemy of Linux/FOSS should never have been in charge of the biggest repository of open source software.
replies(3): >>36407736 #>>36407846 #>>36407868 #
2. gtirloni ◴[] No.36407736[source]
> The biggest enemy of Linux/FOSS

Have they outdone Oracle? Impressive! :)

On a serious note, is your comment based on historical or recent events?

replies(3): >>36407796 #>>36407814 #>>36409467 #
3. tough ◴[] No.36407796[source]
For the historical you have all the EEE tactics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguis...

For recent events, you could look at stuff how VSCode is supposedly Open Source and yet fully ridded with spyware and also propietary plugins...

On github, having MS at the realm has certainly affected too how DMCA's and such are deal with vs the old Github.

replies(1): >>36407842 #
4. dingnuts ◴[] No.36407814[source]
It doesn't matter, the only difference between Nadella era and Ballmer or Gates era is marketing. It's the same Microsoft that it's always been.
5. gtirloni ◴[] No.36407842{3}[source]
The VSCode situation could be improved but isn't there VSCodium to remediate that?

As for DMCA, I think you have to talk to the government officials about how badly it works.

Are there any other recent events that I'm forgetting that make MSFT the biggest enemy of FOSS?

replies(4): >>36408066 #>>36408516 #>>36408518 #>>36409391 #
6. EduardoBautista ◴[] No.36407846[source]
Microsoft earns a significant amount of money from hosting Linux servers and even makes contributions to the kernel.

How are they an enemy?

replies(1): >>36407893 #
7. hoherd ◴[] No.36407868[source]
FYI they also acquired NPM. https://itsfoss.com/microsoft-npm-acquisition
8. orangepurple ◴[] No.36407893[source]
https://web.archive.org/web/20050922005808/http://news.zdnet...

https://web.archive.org/web/20180523190053/https://www.econo...

replies(1): >>36411029 #
9. deciplex ◴[] No.36408066{4}[source]
He gave you a recent event and you conceded the point then suggested he use something else.

And, DMCA is bad law but many companies make it worse in their overzealousness to "comply" with it.

replies(2): >>36408158 #>>36408943 #
10. tough ◴[] No.36408158{5}[source]
I also couldn't find sources to care to respond to him but I remember about some little terminal app which FOSS code was basically stolen by MS from the indie dev and then he was gaslighted about it. I can't find the source in reddit thanks to the going dark thing now lmao. Can't find it now, so maybe I hallucinated it better than some fine LLM's

If anyone else remembers this incident and can link to a source that'd be great for my sanity.

Maybe similar to this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17214257

I do have a love-hate relationship with MS, but I don't love the fact that they own 80% of my stack (Yes, I know, my choice) between TypeScript, VSCode, NPM, Github, etc..

Also on VSCodium, it only fixes the telemetry bullshit, the custom LSP Plugins that microsoft keeps for themselves or whatever are not available there. so If you want to use for example copilot or other -microsoft official- plugins you can't do so on VSCodium

Also let's add the whole Github Copilot WhiteWashing non-FOSS proprietary code into anyone to steal. Basically breaking the current status quo in favour of the megacorps that can steal it all and respect no licenses

replies(3): >>36408788 #>>36408843 #>>36408991 #
11. yjftsjthsd-h ◴[] No.36408516{4}[source]
> The VSCode situation could be improved but isn't there VSCodium to remediate that?

That's a great example, actually, because they'd like you to think that VSCode is open source... but then if you actually use that you can't access a rather lot of the most useful extensions, which is a completely artificial limitation that appears to be there only to prevent people from actually using any fork.

12. nyanpasu64 ◴[] No.36408518{4}[source]
VSCodium is specifically incompatible with Microsoft's proprietary extensions like SSH development, and now the official VS Code Python extension has now switched to a proprietary Pylance language server.
13. ayewo ◴[] No.36408788{6}[source]
You might have been thinking of AppGet which got killed by Microsoft's WinGet https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23331287
replies(1): >>36409827 #
14. pentium166 ◴[] No.36408843{6}[source]
> If anyone else remembers this incident and can link to a source that'd be great for my sanity.

This incident was Casey Muratori raising an issue about Windows Terminal performance:

https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/10362

https://twitter.com/cmuratori/status/1522471966929653761

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateEnd=1687287343&dateRange=custom&...

replies(1): >>36409820 #
15. gtirloni ◴[] No.36408943{5}[source]
> He gave you a recent event and you conceded the point then suggested he use something else.

Not really. It was a good point but it wasn't clearcut.

Of course I don't think the VScode situation is great but it's far from being "the biggest enemy of FOSS".

That's why I was wondering if there were any other recent events. I've not been keeping track, truly.

replies(1): >>36409856 #
16. 6c696e7578 ◴[] No.36408991{6}[source]
Couldn't find what you were looking for, but did find this one:

  https://www.itprotoday.com/windows-78/inside-story-how-microsofts-open-source-code-theft-was-discovered
17. teddyh ◴[] No.36409391{4}[source]
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29579994
replies(1): >>36494867 #
18. jacquesm ◴[] No.36409467[source]
> is your comment based on historical or recent events?

Why would I need to choose between those two? How about 'both'?

19. tough ◴[] No.36409820{7}[source]
Yes thank you this is what I meant, I also actually remembered about AppGet pointed by a sibling comment.

I wouldn't trust MS with my business as an indie dev, that's all

And I wouldn't trust their -true- intentions on FOSS beyond how their incentives align currently with the space

20. tough ◴[] No.36409827{7}[source]
Yes thank you also had seen this one but didn't remember the specifics, there's so many cases it's wild.
21. tough ◴[] No.36409856{6}[source]
I think there's enough recent events pointed by other commenters to at least be able to say with certain grade of truth to it that Microsoft isn't the biggest friend of FOSS as much as they pretend to be with stuff like WSL or whatever
replies(1): >>36412022 #
22. arp242 ◴[] No.36411029{3}[source]
This is more than 20 years old...
replies(1): >>36411537 #
23. jacquesm ◴[] No.36411537{4}[source]
So is Microsoft. And everybody that is currently controlling the company was there when this happened.
replies(1): >>36411575 #
24. arp242 ◴[] No.36411575{5}[source]
And? Are they still doing this kind of stuff or not? If they are, then it would be easy to come up with more recent examples.
replies(1): >>36415385 #
25. gtirloni ◴[] No.36412022{7}[source]
The discussion is around MSFT being the biggest enemy though.
26. jacquesm ◴[] No.36415385{6}[source]
Yes, they are still doing this kind of stuff.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Microsoft

What surprises me is that the tech crowd is so ready to bend over for one of the worst companies on the planet in the software domain. These are the very same people that abused the legal system in every way that they could in order to slow down the adoption rate of open source. They are still doing this today but quietly, for instance by incentivizing municipalities and other government layers to use their software (for free if necessary) just to stop adoption of equivalent open source solutions.

replies(1): >>36415601 #
27. arp242 ◴[] No.36415601{7}[source]
> Yes, they are still doing this kind of stuff.

What specifically?

I'm not trying to be difficult, but linking to a lengthy Wikipedia page is not an argument. From a quick glance a number are old, and a number are just non-issues (e.g. "Mono patent concerns", which was just some baseless FUD mentioned by Stallman once almost 15 years ago), but I didn't read the entire page. "Incentivizing municipalities and other government layers to use their software" could just be normal business practice (or something shady – much depends on the details).

replies(1): >>36418126 #
28. jacquesm ◴[] No.36418126{8}[source]
One recent example would be to trample all over the rights of the open source contributors to github hosted repositories by using their code to incorporate it into Copilot, irrespective of the licensing details. I'm sure that counts for nothing in your book but for me taking open source and using it without attribution shows that MS hasn't changed one bit, they simply see FOSS as another resource to be monetized.

As far as incentivizing municipalities is concerned, they are currently in the docket for anti-trust violations just like they were in the past. Historically MS would swoop in on any governmental org in Europe that would successfully implement FOSS solutions instead of MS based stuff. Not to make money, but just to maintain dominance, another anti-trust play. And they never stopped doing that.

29. teddyh ◴[] No.36494867{5}[source]
Also: <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36492329>