←back to thread

658 points transpute | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.222s | source
Show context
Animats ◴[] No.35844753[source]
There's an upside to this. It can be used politically as an argument against backdoors for "lawful access"[1] to encrypted data.

[1] https://www.fbi.gov/about/mission/lawful-access

replies(6): >>35844809 #>>35844880 #>>35844886 #>>35845051 #>>35845431 #>>35850810 #
voidfunc ◴[] No.35844809[source]
The argument doesn't matter because the federal government and politicians don't give a shit about facts
replies(2): >>35844873 #>>35845768 #
hilbert42 ◴[] No.35844873[source]
Until their PCs get hacked and their medical and psychiatrists' notes about them become front page news.
replies(3): >>35844896 #>>35845322 #>>35845924 #
TheRealPomax ◴[] No.35844896[source]
Sorry, what? This literally happened, THIS YEAR, and not a single one cared beyond saying "oh no, this is terrible, if only there was something we could have done!"

https://apnews.com/article/congress-data-breach-hack-identit...

replies(3): >>35845131 #>>35845219 #>>35846115 #
hilbert42 ◴[] No.35845219[source]
Right. There'll be more, eventually something truly salacious will turn up. When it does keep well away from fans.
replies(6): >>35845346 #>>35846274 #>>35846440 #>>35847248 #>>35847820 #>>35855006 #
hedora ◴[] No.35847248[source]
Like what? Another homophobe southern republican politician gets outted as a pedophile?

A half dozen people testifying that our last president was a serial rapist?

The head of the Supreme Court whining that when congress appoints a probable rapist to the court, the double standard is that the court should be above politics, and not comment on such things, but the press covers it anyway?

At least two of those things actually made the news yesterday.

I’m really not able to think of anything sufficiently salacious to get any more shit on the fan.

replies(2): >>35847717 #>>35850012 #
Root_Denied ◴[] No.35847717[source]
Wasn't there a list of elected officials on Alzheimer's Drugs that was supposed to have been floating around that got shut down hard?

Also if you need another recent example you could reference Dianne Feinstein.

replies(2): >>35850125 #>>35858587 #
1. hilbert42 ◴[] No.35850125[source]
Despite my comment I'm not in favor of deliberately exposing private medical records of anyone, politicians or otherwise. My point is that the fixed and blinkered view of politicians won't change until they're personally affected or harmed.