←back to thread

256 points hirundo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
faeriechangling ◴[] No.35513202[source]
Could this have to so with smart people increasing pursuing hedonism over reproduction? Maybe Idiocracy was right all along.

From a strict evolutionary perspective I have doubts that a high IQ is useful anymore.

replies(6): >>35513534 #>>35513691 #>>35514025 #>>35514331 #>>35519826 #>>35520396 #
giraffe_lady ◴[] No.35513534[source]
From a strict evolutionary perspective it probably hasn't been for a long time and likely never was as significant on an individual level as people like to believe.

The only things being selected for in modern humans, if anything, are going to be things like disease resistance, maybe tolerance to some chemical contaminants in food & water, air pollution. And even then only in some parts of the world.

replies(1): >>35513735 #
1. armatav ◴[] No.35513735[source]
Nope - sexual selection still takes place regardless of environmental survival factors.

And sexual selection takes place faster and can lead populations to scenarios that induce natural selection.