←back to thread

688 points hunglee2 | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.733s | source | bottom
Show context
sschueller ◴[] No.34712588[source]
Usually destroying 40% of a countries energy resource is considered an act of war but I guess if it's your ally that also spies on your top officials it's OK. /s
replies(2): >>34712621 #>>34712779 #
1. dang ◴[] No.34712621[source]
Please make your substantive points without snark or flamebait. This topic is obviously as inflammable as it gets.

More at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34712496

replies(2): >>34712688 #>>34712811 #
2. sschueller ◴[] No.34712688[source]
Sorry, got emotional, can't seem to be able to delete it anymore. It's extremely infuriating situation having to deal with the consequences of what a few top officials decide the world should look like and expecting at least one side to play fair.
replies(2): >>34712765 #>>34713378 #
3. wizzwizz4 ◴[] No.34712765[source]
You can't delete once there's a reply. As a hack, some people edit the message to contain only the text "deleted": it's often poor practice, but since the only reply is from dang I think it'd be okay here.
4. isoprophlex ◴[] No.34712811[source]
Off topic but I really hope you wrote "obviously inflammable" there because this is a about gas pipes blowing up

Pun intended or not, it's got me laughing

replies(1): >>34713397 #
5. dang ◴[] No.34713378[source]
No need to delete. I know these things can be intensely infuriating—all of us have some topic that hits us like that. Managing that without bursting into flames is a work-in-progress and we're all learning together (myself definitely included).
6. ◴[] No.34713397[source]