←back to thread

258 points polyrand | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
aabhay ◴[] No.34490445[source]
In enterprise, it’s often the case that your biggest customer effectively owns you. They get to dictate roadmaps, you’re forced to spin up a special team just for them, and it becomes harder to justify your investment into long tail customers because this big golden monkey is on your back.
replies(4): >>34491293 #>>34491532 #>>34491913 #>>34494194 #
1. snird ◴[] No.34491913[source]
If managed well, you can ride this "golden monkey" to heaven. So is the case of TSMC with Apple.
replies(2): >>34492087 #>>34492131 #
2. ketzo ◴[] No.34492087[source]
To expand on this great example a little: TSMC is a really smart case, because the chip business is all about extraordinarily high up-front development costs and near-zero marginal costs.

TSMC uses Apple as their first-and-best customer for their bleeding edge chips, using fat stacks of iPhone cash to push the limits of semiconductor technology.

Then they can keep selling chips built on that process for a decade or more (to a very long tail of other customers).

Nobody would say that TSMC isn't dependent on Apple! They're certainly tied very tightly. But they've turned that dependency into just the top of a very profitable funnel.

3. ajb ◴[] No.34492131[source]
TSMC has many customers. If they lost Apple (and I don't see how) they could have to make some hard decisions but they would still be the world's top fab.
replies(1): >>34492168 #
4. ketzo ◴[] No.34492168[source]
Yeah, but that's looking at them today, as the definitive #1 fab in the world.

The path they took to get here was all about doubling down on Apple.

replies(1): >>34506514 #
5. ajb ◴[] No.34506514{3}[source]
They were #1 when the ipod came out. At that point UMC were AMD to their Intel. They have been dominant in the fab business for longer than the iphone existed.