←back to thread

258 points polyrand | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
aabhay ◴[] No.34490445[source]
In enterprise, it’s often the case that your biggest customer effectively owns you. They get to dictate roadmaps, you’re forced to spin up a special team just for them, and it becomes harder to justify your investment into long tail customers because this big golden monkey is on your back.
replies(4): >>34491293 #>>34491532 #>>34491913 #>>34494194 #
ketzo ◴[] No.34491293[source]
I worked briefly at FedEx corporate, and they made a big deal about their policy that a customer could never account for more than 30% of total volume.

Leadership often made it clear that Amazon was right at that limit, and wanted to send a lot more volume, but FedEx wouldn't let them, in order to maintain "independence."

To your point: it didn’t stop them from working to cater to Amazon’s every whim, and it did provide Amazon the incentive to build a (better and more cost-effective) fulfillment and shipping network themselves.

I don’t know what the “right” play was, and obviously the story is far from over. But FedEx always seemed to me like they chose the worst of both worlds.

replies(2): >>34491541 #>>34492253 #
mritchie712 ◴[] No.34491541[source]
What % of FedEx revenue was from Amazon? Would have guessed it'd be much less than 30%.
replies(2): >>34491717 #>>34492426 #
1. ketzo ◴[] No.34491717[source]
I wasn't high-up enough to have that kind of number, sadly :D

It's an interesting question, though -- I'm sure Amazon had a very favorable contract, so to your point, probably less than 30%.