←back to thread

125 points akeck | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.939s | source
Show context
charcircuit ◴[] No.33579956[source]
Looking at the comment section it seems that people struggle to understand how it works and thinks it is literally copying parts of people's images.

Educating people about such a technical topic seems very difficult especially since people get emotional of their work being used.

replies(6): >>33580043 #>>33580089 #>>33580091 #>>33580110 #>>33580133 #>>33581243 #
kadoban ◴[] No.33580089[source]
It's worse than copying parts of images, it's replacing artists.

I know because I'm literally working on setting up Dreambooth to do what I'd otherwise have to pay an artist to do.

And not only is it replacing artists, it's using their own work to do so. None of these could exist without being trained on the original artwork.

Surely you can imagine why they're largely not happy?

replies(1): >>33580251 #
toomuchtodo ◴[] No.33580251[source]
No one is happy when technology renders them obsolete or drives the marginal cost of what they produce to zero.
replies(4): >>33580273 #>>33580364 #>>33580415 #>>33583500 #
kadoban ◴[] No.33580273[source]
And in my lifetime it'll probably come for coders too.

What happens to society when none of the workers are needed anymore, and any pretense of it being anything other than solely "the rich get richer" disappears?

replies(1): >>33580307 #
1. toomuchtodo ◴[] No.33580307[source]
Transition to a superior compatible economic system? It’s all I’ve got honestly as a suggestion. The technology is coming regardless.
replies(1): >>33580365 #
2. kadoban ◴[] No.33580365[source]
Yeah, that's about the only real choice, but how messy will it be getting there? Certain political parties will absolutely burn everything down before they let anything like that happen.