←back to thread

1444 points feross | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
joe_the_user ◴[] No.32642764[source]
It's worth noting that American censorship in, say, 1960, was at close to the same level.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_censorship_in_the_United_...

replies(6): >>32642876 #>>32642898 #>>32643473 #>>32643557 #>>32643846 #>>32644219 #
pnemonic ◴[] No.32642876[source]
Is it just as worth noting then that China is more than 60 years behind the US in terms of social progress?
replies(4): >>32642966 #>>32642977 #>>32643288 #>>32643428 #
planb ◴[] No.32642977[source]
“Behind” implies that they’re following and moving in the same direction. Unfortunately, I don’t think that’s the case.
replies(2): >>32643394 #>>32643470 #
1. vkou ◴[] No.32643394[source]
No, behind implies that they are currently in the opposite direction of the current direction of western cultural movement. If the direction of our movement changes, they will, without lifting a finger, become ahead of us.

Social progress is inherently subjective (because progress in one value system is actually a regression in a different value system), and the observer always grounds their claim of 'behind' or 'ahead' in their culture's viewpoint.