←back to thread

1444 points feross | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jrm4 ◴[] No.32641533[source]
I find that it's always interesting to THEN consider, okay -- while there's no centralized board or anything -- what does e.g. American censorship go after?
replies(13): >>32641558 #>>32641741 #>>32641840 #>>32642051 #>>32642100 #>>32642172 #>>32642292 #>>32642369 #>>32642503 #>>32642581 #>>32642807 #>>32646186 #>>32656381 #
cdot2 ◴[] No.32641558[source]
Anything you can think of you will be able to find that content. We simply don't have the kind of censorship that China has. Comparing the two is ridiculous.
replies(5): >>32641585 #>>32641625 #>>32641629 #>>32641994 #>>32643413 #
jrm4 ◴[] No.32641625[source]
Your second sentence is absolutely correct, the others are not.

Easy example: compare the Marvel "Civil War" comics to the movies. The former was critical of the military in a way that could not happen in any big blockbuster movie.

replies(6): >>32641695 #>>32641813 #>>32641845 #>>32641892 #>>32641933 #>>32642305 #
buscoquadnary ◴[] No.32642305[source]
What? Plenty of movies are super critical of the military and the 3 letter agencies in tons of ways, heck there is a whole genre out there about Government military agent realizes he's doing bad things and goes rogue to correct those misdeeds.

Then you've got things like Full Metal Jacket, which I don't think is getting anyone to sign up for the forces.

Like Top Gun did well recently, but is one of the only movies I can think of in the past couple of years that actually portrayed the US military in a mostly positive light rather than the usual gamut which runs from ineffective bumbling ossfied and useless to straight up evil.

I'm just saying you can make whatever you want in the US and portray pretty much any idea or theme, that doesn't mean people will like it, but you can make it. In China there is no similar comparison they'll take your studio at best or imprison you at worst.

replies(2): >>32642573 #>>32642710 #
1. jrm4 ◴[] No.32642573[source]
I don't think so. I think it's in tons of ways except those that would really call into question the whole thing. Which is to say -- I think that to the extent that "the Military" controls its image, it's smart enough to include just enough problematic stuff.

So the ones that seem "anti-Military" are really "anti-traitors-in-the-Military," and/or the healthy kind of self-criticism.