←back to thread

1680 points etbusch | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
petilon ◴[] No.31435505[source]
Still no retina display option. Steve Jobs made the right call over a decade ago... the only scaling that looks good after 100% is 200%. Any in-between scaling will have display artifacts.

This laptop has 150% scaling. What sort of display artifacts can you expect because of this? Go to a web page with a grid, with 1-pixel horizontal grid lines. Even though all lines are set to 1-pixel, some lines will appear thicker than others.

I blame Microsoft for this mess. Windows supports in-between resolutions (with display artifacts), and hardware manufacturers therefore manufacture in-between resolutions. Framework laptop is limited to what the display manufacturers put out.

replies(9): >>31435534 #>>31435544 #>>31435704 #>>31435840 #>>31435937 #>>31436188 #>>31436195 #>>31436260 #>>31436741 #
pkulak ◴[] No.31435704[source]
It's possible for an OS to support fractional scaling properly; just tell applications to render their windows 1.5 times larger, map the inputs properly, and turn off font anti-aliasing. The problem is that it requires every app to be updated, which hasn't happened everywhere yet. Android and iOS, for example, do it perfectly. So does ChromeOS.
replies(3): >>31435915 #>>31435961 #>>31437618 #
arinlen ◴[] No.31435915[source]
> (...) just tell applications to render their windows 1.5 times larger, map the inputs properly, and turn off font anti-aliasing.

Doesn't disabling anti-aliasing make things look worse? Unintentional and random jagged lines never look right.

replies(2): >>31436278 #>>31438473 #
1. OctopusLupid ◴[] No.31438473[source]
Is it possible GP was talking about sub-pixel font anti-aliasing, which would look wrong when scaled?