←back to thread

1680 points etbusch | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
petilon ◴[] No.31435505[source]
Still no retina display option. Steve Jobs made the right call over a decade ago... the only scaling that looks good after 100% is 200%. Any in-between scaling will have display artifacts.

This laptop has 150% scaling. What sort of display artifacts can you expect because of this? Go to a web page with a grid, with 1-pixel horizontal grid lines. Even though all lines are set to 1-pixel, some lines will appear thicker than others.

I blame Microsoft for this mess. Windows supports in-between resolutions (with display artifacts), and hardware manufacturers therefore manufacture in-between resolutions. Framework laptop is limited to what the display manufacturers put out.

replies(9): >>31435534 #>>31435544 #>>31435704 #>>31435840 #>>31435937 #>>31436188 #>>31436195 #>>31436260 #>>31436741 #
cowtools ◴[] No.31435534[source]
besides the fact that "retina display" is a marketing term invented by Apple, I don't really see what the big deal is. I have pretty good vision and I don't notice individual pixels on my 1080p screen. More pixels means more load on the GPU.
replies(7): >>31435670 #>>31435730 #>>31435757 #>>31435778 #>>31435870 #>>31435901 #>>31438995 #
arinlen ◴[] No.31435778[source]
> I have pretty good vision and I don't notice individual pixels on my 1080p screen.

1080p doesn't mean much if you leave out the screen's pixel density. There's a world of difference between a smartphone with a 5' 1080p screen and a 24' monitor with a 1080p screen.

replies(2): >>31436259 #>>31436314 #
1. LtdJorge ◴[] No.31436259[source]
And distance to it