←back to thread

214 points SkyMarshal | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
saagarjha ◴[] No.28230503[source]
Better link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.15181

The results are fairly obvious: CMB and Hawking radiation provide almost zero power output, while an accretion disk and relativistic jets can provide a lot of power.

replies(2): >>28230601 #>>28231063 #
kragen ◴[] No.28230601[source]
Oh cool, CC-BY!

In theory you can get an arbitrary amount of power from Hawking radiation if you have a lot of very small black holes instead of just one big one. I feel like the stability of the negative-feedback control systems for their orbits might be important here, especially if they're orbiting something you care about like your home planet.

replies(1): >>28230733 #
m_mueller ◴[] No.28230733[source]
As far as I understand, small black holes could be used as a super efficient energy storage („Kugelblitz“), but hardly as a source, assuming that primordial black holes are rare. Primordial black holes afaik are the only theorized origin of a sub stellar mass black hole at this stage of the universe‘s timeline.
replies(2): >>28231067 #>>28231105 #
kragen ◴[] No.28231105[source]
Yeah, making tiny black holes could be pretty challenging, but I feel like it's just an engineering challenge. Is there a fundamental reason I'm missing that you can't just build a really precise, solar-system-scale particle accelerator to slam together a lot of mass into a tiny space to make tiny black holes?
replies(4): >>28231121 #>>28231216 #>>28231270 #>>28231432 #
faeyanpiraat ◴[] No.28231121[source]
I don’t like the idea of having a black hole of any size in my solar system.
replies(3): >>28231161 #>>28231230 #>>28231263 #
hkt ◴[] No.28231230{3}[source]
I have bad news for you:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.11090

replies(1): >>28231244 #
m_mueller ◴[] No.28231244{4}[source]
this would easily be the most awesome discovery of the last 50 years if it turned out true and we could locate and study it...
replies(1): >>28231548 #
hkt ◴[] No.28231548{5}[source]
Only 50?
replies(2): >>28231844 #>>28232554 #
1. m_mueller ◴[] No.28232554{6}[source]
maybe more than that, but I‘d say various discoveries during the golden age of physics would be contenders. Quantum effects, SRT & GRT, nuclear energy, among others. Black holes are just one interesting phenomenon of nature, albeit a pretty fundamental one.