←back to thread

527 points lxm | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.474s | source
Show context
sksksk ◴[] No.27673432[source]
When they work well, they're really good, but when they work badly, they're _really_ bad.

The other week, I went for dinner at a place that had a online ordering system. My experience was as follows...

Arrive at the table, scan the QR code

No phone signal in the restaurant, so I need to connect to the wifi.

Connect to the wifi, get a captive portal

Need to put my phone number in to connect to the wifi; there is no signal, so I need to go outside, to receieve the confirmation code.

Connected to the wifi, scan the code again, choose my food.

Go to pay, need to register an account

Put my email address in, I already have an account on this food ordering service!?

Do a password reset

Put in my credit card details (why not use apple pay?).

This whole time, we're sat at a table, in theory to meet friends, but we've spent the first 15 minutes all glued to our phones!

replies(26): >>27673456 #>>27673485 #>>27673529 #>>27673544 #>>27673575 #>>27673592 #>>27673616 #>>27673680 #>>27673725 #>>27673750 #>>27674317 #>>27674718 #>>27674768 #>>27674810 #>>27675286 #>>27675356 #>>27675397 #>>27675440 #>>27676026 #>>27676226 #>>27676355 #>>27677430 #>>27678005 #>>27687050 #>>27687537 #>>27689555 #
HelloNurse ◴[] No.27673485[source]
Assuming there was another restaurant nearby, I'd have simplified the process to "go outside". If a restaurant is too cheap to print a menu, why should I consider it good enough for me?
replies(1): >>27673590 #
topicseed ◴[] No.27673590[source]
With covid, many restaurants removed paper menus to avoid transmission. I hate QR codes so that was a move I was not in favour of.....
replies(7): >>27673742 #>>27673766 #>>27673777 #>>27673998 #>>27674555 #>>27674981 #>>27675450 #
FractalParadigm ◴[] No.27673777[source]
Most, if not all restaurants I've been to around my area, were already either using or switched to using laminated sheets, sometimes bound in a plastic or leather cover. Plastic-enclosed paper is trivial to sanitize and lasts a VERY long time, plus I would like to imagine a laminator is quite a bit cheaper in the long-term than maintaining separate menu websites for every individual location.

It's amazing how some can re-invent the simplest of ideas simply for the sake of getting tech rammed into the stream.

replies(3): >>27674195 #>>27675921 #>>27676244 #
a_imho ◴[] No.27674195[source]
It is not for tech sake, this is building a database. Never attribute to incompetence what can be adequately explained by bogus engagement KPIs
replies(2): >>27674455 #>>27675990 #
dgb23 ◴[] No.27674455[source]
Orders are typically stored anyways?
replies(1): >>27674520 #
atatatat ◴[] No.27674520[source]
But not how long you stared at the deserts, or what side of the "give me lobster" button you pressed.
replies(2): >>27674858 #>>27675334 #
1. tomrod ◴[] No.27674858[source]
Meaningless and trivial metrics, ultimately. Third order at best.
replies(1): >>27675138 #
2. bluGill ◴[] No.27675138[source]
Probably, but it is still data that is cheap to store. IF someone can find something useful in just 1% of those things 10 years from now all the cost to collect and store all that data will be worth the investment - or so they hope. They probably will too - the cost vs reward is very skewed.