←back to thread

1743 points caspii | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.42s | source
Show context
shmiga ◴[] No.27430926[source]
SEO is so broken, it's not about website content or website quality. It's about how much money you pay to some punks - "SEO experts" who are hacking a system. I'm so sick of that.
replies(7): >>27430980 #>>27431135 #>>27431251 #>>27431284 #>>27431480 #>>27431527 #>>27436930 #
1vuio0pswjnm7 ◴[] No.27431480[source]
Fix the system? People who comment online seem to think the concept of the "search engine" cannot be improved, except by Google. The list of inactive search engines at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine is depressing. The problem for us is that the supposed innovator Google has little financial incentive to improve the system regarding "content" or "quality". As long as the traffic keeps coming, the ad revenue keeps coming. Their best bet is promote what's "popular" ("top-ranking"). Because the traffic keeps coming no matter what Google does, "content" and "quality" are not really their major concerns. There are no true alternatives for users. Bing is basically a Google clone. No new ideas. Other search engines, like DDG, just piggyback off Google or Bing crawlers. Not sure about Baidu, Yandex or others but I suspect they are more or less Google clones as well. In every case, advertising dictates design. No new ideas.
replies(2): >>27431688 #>>27578612 #
1. raxxorrax ◴[] No.27578612[source]
If a topic or search term is present in any form of news article (If one paper has them, they all have them shortly after), the search results are just extremely bad. You know that Google promotes its media friends and by now Google results look like an ad list. They haven't stopped innovating, they are moving backwards.

It would need an option to ignore any form of news media in search results.