←back to thread

980 points nkcmr | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
toxik ◴[] No.27415754[source]
Chinese originated spam and abuse is so outrageously widespread, I don’t understand why there isn’t a conversation going on about cutting them off from the wider internet. They blocked most of it anyway.
replies(8): >>27415770 #>>27415797 #>>27415801 #>>27416273 #>>27416375 #>>27416773 #>>27416937 #>>27417395 #
wyager ◴[] No.27415770[source]
I would rather have a global network with marginally more spam than a regional network with marginally less.
replies(3): >>27415826 #>>27415879 #>>27416080 #
kortilla ◴[] No.27416080[source]
This false dichotomy is impressive. A single country accounting for for 50+% sets up the choice to be, “a global network with a lot less spam and a regional island with a lot of spam” vs “a global network with a ton of spam barely connected to a regional network that much of the spam originates from”.
replies(1): >>27416708 #
npteljes ◴[] No.27416708[source]
That "single country" is of 1.4B people.
replies(1): >>27419195 #
sumedh ◴[] No.27419195[source]
Why does that matter?
replies(1): >>27419291 #
1. alach11 ◴[] No.27419291[source]
Calling China "a single country" minimizes the fact that it contains 18% of the world's people. It's hard to call something a "global network" if it leaves out that much of the world.
replies(1): >>27419573 #
2. sumedh ◴[] No.27419573[source]
What is your definition of global then?

Why isnt 82% of the worlds's people global?