←back to thread

Signal adds a payments feature with a privacy-focused cryptocurrency

(www.wired.com)
544 points josh2600 | 9 comments | 06 Apr 21 16:23 UTC | HN request time: 0.687s | source | bottom
Show context
Geee ◴[06 Apr 21 18:14 UTC] No.26715348[source]▶
There are 250 million units of mobilecoin, and majority of them are owned by the founders. Only 37.5 million have been distributed. With current price ($65), they're worth $14B already. This makes the project a scam and impossible for it to work as a reliable money that holds value. Bitcoin had no pre-mine and has been fairly distributed from the start.
replies(15): >>26716669 #>>26717253 #>>26717289 #>>26717334 #>>26717384 #>>26717443 #>>26717846 #>>26717892 #>>26718428 #>>26718433 #>>26718469 #>>26720601 #>>26721205 #>>26726961 #>>26727388 #
lottin ◴[06 Apr 21 20:56 UTC] No.26717289[source]▶
Bitcoin rates worse than North Korea in terms of wealth distribution as measured by the Gini coefficient. [1]

[1] https://blog.dshr.org/2018/10/gini-coefficients-of-cryptocur...

replies(2): >>26718008 #>>26718159 #
1. modeless ◴[06 Apr 21 22:12 UTC] No.26718008[source]▶
All calculations of this sort are fatally flawed because they assume all the coins in one address are owned by one person. That would be like calculating the US Gini coefficient assuming that all bank accounts are owned by the CEO of the bank.
replies(3): >>26718688 #>>26719108 #>>26720362 #
2. warkdarrior ◴[06 Apr 21 23:35 UTC] No.26718688[source]▶
If many coin owners share the same address, that is not very decentralized, is it?
replies(1): >>26719181 #
3. Barrin92 ◴[07 Apr 21 00:31 UTC] No.26719108[source]▶
Who shares a bitcoin wallet or operates one like a bank? If anything the opposite is more likely, several bitcoin wallets belong to single individuals, probably in particular for some of the high net worth ones in an attempt to obfuscate ownership, which if anything, understates how concentrated it is.
replies(1): >>26719163 #
4. everfree ◴[07 Apr 21 00:37 UTC] No.26719163[source]▶
> Who shares a bitcoin wallet or operates one like a bank?

Almost every bitcoin exchange.

It's typical to pool user funds into a relatively small number of addresses.

5. risho ◴[07 Apr 21 00:39 UTC] No.26719181[source]▶
that's like saying that the internet isn't decentralized because lots of people interact using facebook. that address isn't decentralized, much like facebook isn't. that doesn't mean that bitcoin or the internet aren't decentralized.
replies(2): >>26721398 #>>26721435 #
6. atweiden ◴[07 Apr 21 03:42 UTC] No.26720362[source]▶
> All calculations of this sort are fatally flawed because they assume all the coins in one address are owned by one person.

But don’t the calculations equally assume coins spread out across multiple addresses aren’t owned by one person, when in fact they often are?

replies(1): >>26720535 #
7. modeless ◴[07 Apr 21 04:15 UTC] No.26720535[source]▶
Sure but that doesn't offset the first problem, it's just an additional problem. In fact I believe it could move the fake Gini coefficient in either direction depending on how each person splits their money.
8. lottin ◴[07 Apr 21 07:18 UTC] No.26721398{3}[source]▶
"Decentralized" means little without more context. The issuance of bitcoins isn't a legal monopoly. In this sense Bitcoin is "decentralized". On the other hand the Bitcoin blockchain is a centralized ledger, which is distributed, but nonetheless centralized. So which one is it? Centralized or decentralized? It doesn't matter because at this stage "decentralized" is being used as a mere buzzword rather than to convey a precise meaning.
9. creata ◴[07 Apr 21 07:24 UTC] No.26721435{3}[source]▶
> that's like saying that the internet isn't decentralized because lots of people interact using facebook

Yes, and I do say that. Decentralization is a lot less interesting if most people just end up centralizing anyway.