←back to thread

425 points nixass | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
DangitBobby ◴[] No.26674437[source]
What happens to reactors after 50 or 100 years of global/national decline due to environmental and geopolitical circumstances?
replies(6): >>26674489 #>>26674509 #>>26674528 #>>26674531 #>>26674716 #>>26675607 #
politician ◴[] No.26674489[source]
Would you be OK with putting the reactors on the Moon and beaming the power down to Earth?
replies(3): >>26674537 #>>26674584 #>>26674608 #
toomuchtodo ◴[] No.26674537[source]
Sure, 8 light minutes away sounds great. We’ll even get some light out of the transmission of energy to us and the waste is taken care of.
replies(1): >>26674570 #
Pfhreak ◴[] No.26674570[source]
The moon is much, much closer than 8 light minutes away. Are you thinking of the sun? It's already doing a good job at sending energy to us from nuclear reactions.
replies(1): >>26674581 #
toomuchtodo ◴[] No.26674581[source]
That’s the joke. The Sun is safe, cheap fusion at a distance. Enough sunlight hits the Earth in 30 minutes (I’ve seen figures as low as 2 minutes from the UAE, but am conservative for argument’s sake) to power humanity for a year.
replies(2): >>26674692 #>>26674720 #
politician ◴[] No.26674720[source]
Unfortunately, the same NIMBY crowd that hates nuclear also hates the idea of fields of solar cells and the idea of fields of wind farms.
replies(1): >>26674910 #
toomuchtodo ◴[] No.26674910[source]
And yet, renewables account for almost all new generation being turned up.

Turns out there are lots of places to install panels and turbines where there aren’t NIMBYs.

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=46416

replies(1): >>26675021 #
1. yellowapple ◴[] No.26675021[source]
There are also lots of places to build nuclear power plants without NIMBYs.

Point being, NIMBYs often have a rather inflated idea of what counts as "in my back yard".