←back to thread

1005 points femfosec | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.243s | source
Show context
kjjjjjjjjjjjjjj ◴[] No.26614205[source]
I had an experience at work where a coworker (who is black) shared his experience of being told to "stay in his lane" early on in his career. The insinuation was of course racism, he didn't mention it but it was obvious. Then I and someone else (who are white) shared our exact same experiences.

He told me he felt cut off, etc, even though we were sharing the same experience. If we had something similar happen, how can he definitively attribute that experience to racism? Even if it was, that was not the point of the conversation. We were all sharing our experiences on that topic and no one mentioned race. Why do we need to bend ourselves backwards to make sure all minorities feel comfortable all the time?

The point here is you can't talk to minority groups about anything these days, if you are white.

replies(6): >>26615653 #>>26615813 #>>26616117 #>>26616163 #>>26616174 #>>26616293 #
vmception ◴[] No.26616117[source]
> Why do we need to bend ourselves backwards to make sure all minorities feel comfortable all the time?

> The point here is you can't talk to minority groups about anything these days, if you are white.

You lost me here.

You had one experience with one person and extrapolated that to multiple entire groups.

You should be able to discern how your conversation with that one person was okay and not a "cancelable" offense, and how your comment that I quoted is not okay and could be a "cancelable" offense. Or if that's not the issue, you should be able to see how to have that conversation.

Can you see that I can't tell if you've been pushed to extreme views where you wind up on websites where other people say the same thing and agree with you, or if you all your experiences are segregated like this to the point you would fit a definition of racist?

That was rhetorical.

The point is that your one experience is something fairly predictable but not an area that validates your complaint. There would be a way to continue that conversation, acknowledge the person's experience and how they conflate that with race-based oppression, while also being able to contribute to the conversation.

replies(1): >>26617348 #
anm89 ◴[] No.26617348[source]
I'm going to guess the parent has more than one experience
replies(2): >>26617406 #>>26617844 #
deanCommie ◴[] No.26617844[source]
So, just to make sure I understand. a minority person reports a story: "That's just one example! That's not racism!"

A white person reports this story and says "see, minorities exaggerate." and you are willing to give them the benefit of the doubt that it must have happened to more than one person.

Do you see the problem?

replies(1): >>26626649 #
1. anm89 ◴[] No.26626649[source]
Whatever you think you are responding to in between the lines of my comment isn't there.

My only comment was regarding the number of experiences of the parent. Nothing less, nothing more.