←back to thread

131 points mg | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
briga ◴[] No.26597549[source]
This is good to hear. I assume location must play a large part in this? Solar must be more cost-effective in, say, the Mojave desert, than it is in Alaska.

I sometimes wonder if the widespread adoption of solar is going to have an environmental impact that isn't immediately apparent. Every solar panel you put on the ground is going to take up solar energy that could otherwise be absorbed by a plant, which in turn means that plant can't absorb carbon from the atmosphere. So unless we just limit ourselves to rooftop solar panels there's sure to be some sort of environmental impact if we just switch all our energy to solar.

replies(8): >>26597576 #>>26597593 #>>26597642 #>>26597844 #>>26597847 #>>26597971 #>>26598152 #>>26598678 #
jxidjhdhdhdhfhf ◴[] No.26597971[source]
One possibility is to use farmland or grazing land. You can pick crops that do better in part shade and then place solar panels over them. If done right it could have a beneficial effect on crop growth while at the same time earning extra money.
replies(2): >>26598043 #>>26598357 #
Danieru ◴[] No.26598357[source]
This is a allowed but semi-rare technique in Japan. Rare because of the capital costs to built the panels. Certain high end plants, such as tea, prefer the shade.
replies(1): >>26609346 #
1. imtringued ◴[] No.26609346[source]
It would be interesting in northern Africa. Install soil erosion blankets and then put solar panels on top to reduce evaporation. Trim the plant growth to increase the biomass available to the soil.