←back to thread

131 points mg | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.272s | source
Show context
rich_sasha ◴[] No.26597628[source]
If solar were free, but we still needed to pay for battery storage, how would it then compare in cost to fuel-based alternatives (fossil fuel, nuclear etc)?
replies(6): >>26597661 #>>26597691 #>>26597763 #>>26597783 #>>26597850 #>>26598615 #
turtlebits ◴[] No.26597783[source]
People use way too much power for battery storage to be viable. The average household consumes 28.9kwh in a day (in 2017), which is way more than rooftop solar can provide.

Maybe when we have smaller houses and don't have a bajillion devices plugged in all the time.

replies(7): >>26597883 #>>26597905 #>>26597922 #>>26597926 #>>26597927 #>>26597962 #>>26598216 #
coderintherye ◴[] No.26597905[source]
The majority of solar comes from Utility scale about 60/40 vs. rooftop solar: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_in_the_United_Stat...
replies(1): >>26598353 #
flgb ◴[] No.26598353[source]
Not in Australia, where we have much more roof-top solar (and which is less than half-the-price installed of roof-top in the US)
replies(1): >>26598740 #
kragen ◴[] No.26598740[source]
Interesting! Do you have any idea why it's so much cheaper?
replies(2): >>26598754 #>>26600710 #
flgb ◴[] No.26600710[source]
Hyper-competitive low-margin market, many very efficient vertically-integrated solar sales businesses (sales, installation, logistics), lower selling costs (very engaged consumers), most homes single story so lower installation costs, and lower permitting and connection costs.
replies(1): >>26603432 #
1. kragen ◴[] No.26603432[source]
Thank you very much! Do you have any idea how the costs of a typical Australian rooftop system break down? I'm curious about the relative importance of these factors.