←back to thread

131 points mg | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
rich_sasha ◴[] No.26597628[source]
If solar were free, but we still needed to pay for battery storage, how would it then compare in cost to fuel-based alternatives (fossil fuel, nuclear etc)?
replies(6): >>26597661 #>>26597691 #>>26597763 #>>26597783 #>>26597850 #>>26598615 #
turtlebits ◴[] No.26597783[source]
People use way too much power for battery storage to be viable. The average household consumes 28.9kwh in a day (in 2017), which is way more than rooftop solar can provide.

Maybe when we have smaller houses and don't have a bajillion devices plugged in all the time.

replies(7): >>26597883 #>>26597905 #>>26597922 #>>26597926 #>>26597927 #>>26597962 #>>26598216 #
hn_throwaway_99 ◴[] No.26597927[source]
Most people will have a big battery in their garage capable of powering their house for days pretty soon.
replies(1): >>26598116 #
turtlebits ◴[] No.26598116[source]
Unless battery prices drastically drop, 2 days of power is 60kwh (quoting earlier figure), even if batteries were $100/kwh, that's $6000 in batteries (or ~$9 if you're on grid)

edit: bad math, had $60k

replies(3): >>26598217 #>>26598312 #>>26605896 #
nicoburns ◴[] No.26598312[source]
What makes you think they won't drop significantly? PV panel costs have dropped by dramtically due to efficiencies of scale, and batteries are only just seeing production begin to ramp up.
replies(1): >>26599365 #
1. rhodozelia ◴[] No.26599365[source]
how long before I can buy a Tesla for 50% of what one costs now? If the batteries are going to get so cheap we should be seeing some great price drops in electric cars. If not ... why not? And that reason will probably apply to battery energy storage too.