←back to thread

131 points mg | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
rich_sasha ◴[] No.26597628[source]
If solar were free, but we still needed to pay for battery storage, how would it then compare in cost to fuel-based alternatives (fossil fuel, nuclear etc)?
replies(6): >>26597661 #>>26597691 #>>26597763 #>>26597783 #>>26597850 #>>26598615 #
kleton ◴[] No.26597691[source]
Would need $20/KWh battery storage to be competitive with nuclear for baseload according to https://www.cell.com/joule/fulltext/S2542-4351(19)30300-9 At the moment, we're at about $800/KWh.
replies(3): >>26597895 #>>26597898 #>>26598636 #
jxidjhdhdhdhfhf ◴[] No.26597895[source]
Aren't car battery packs under $100/KWh? Is there some other factor which drives up the price for grid level storage?
replies(1): >>26598247 #
manfredo ◴[] No.26598247[source]
The factor that drives up price for grid level storage is scale. Only ~300 GWh worth of batteries is produced globally each year. The world uses 2.5 TWh of electricity each hour. If anyone tries to install battery storage at a significant scale, demand will vastly outstrip supply and drive prices up.
replies(3): >>26598258 #>>26598590 #>>26599059 #
1. ◴[] No.26598258[source]