←back to thread

131 points mg | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.96s | source
Show context
rich_sasha ◴[] No.26597628[source]
If solar were free, but we still needed to pay for battery storage, how would it then compare in cost to fuel-based alternatives (fossil fuel, nuclear etc)?
replies(6): >>26597661 #>>26597691 #>>26597763 #>>26597783 #>>26597850 #>>26598615 #
turtlebits ◴[] No.26597783[source]
People use way too much power for battery storage to be viable. The average household consumes 28.9kwh in a day (in 2017), which is way more than rooftop solar can provide.

Maybe when we have smaller houses and don't have a bajillion devices plugged in all the time.

replies(7): >>26597883 #>>26597905 #>>26597922 #>>26597926 #>>26597927 #>>26597962 #>>26598216 #
1. zizee ◴[] No.26597922[source]
> The average household consumes 28.9kwh in a day

Maybe in the USA.

> which is way more than rooftop solar can provide.

Maybe in your part of the world this is true, but it is not unrealistic in many places.

Also, why are you limiting your thinking to rooftop solar?

replies(2): >>26598065 #>>26598202 #
2. turtlebits ◴[] No.26598065[source]
The article is referring to the prices in the US.

When land is at a premium, most people aren't going to cover their yard with solar panels. . Rooftop is already generally accepted.

replies(1): >>26598916 #
3. makomk ◴[] No.26598202[source]
Probably in a lot of countries in the future. One common reason countries have lower average household electricity consumption is the widespread use of non-electric heating, and there's been a huge push to switch to electric heating for environmental reasons.
replies(1): >>26599788 #
4. belltaco ◴[] No.26598916[source]
I don't get it, are these built on people's yards?

https://constructionreviewonline.com/biggest-projects/top-5-...

5. zizee ◴[] No.26599788[source]
American houses tend to be bigger than those in other countries, and built with poor insulation than say those of europe.